jbrown macrumors 6502a Original poster Jul 7, 2002 997 4 London Oct 28, 2007 #1 I've just upgraded to a 2.4 - very happy with it and much snappier However, I'd be very interested if someone could list out the advantages of the 2.4 over the 1.8. cheers
I've just upgraded to a 2.4 - very happy with it and much snappier However, I'd be very interested if someone could list out the advantages of the 2.4 over the 1.8. cheers
peapody macrumors 68040 Oct 7, 2007 3,176 142 San Francisco, CA Oct 28, 2007 #2 jbrown said: I've just upgraded to a 2.4 - very happy with it and much snappier However, I'd be very interested if someone could list out the advantages of the 2.4 over the 1.8. cheers Click to expand... I think you said it yourself right there...
jbrown said: I've just upgraded to a 2.4 - very happy with it and much snappier However, I'd be very interested if someone could list out the advantages of the 2.4 over the 1.8. cheers Click to expand... I think you said it yourself right there...
Brianstorm91 macrumors 65816 Sep 30, 2007 1,365 0 Cambridge, UK Oct 28, 2007 #3 jbrown said: However, I'd be very interested if someone could list out the advantages of the 2.4 over the 1.8. Click to expand... I believe the general consensus is that it's .6 GHz faster
jbrown said: However, I'd be very interested if someone could list out the advantages of the 2.4 over the 1.8. Click to expand... I believe the general consensus is that it's .6 GHz faster
B blurb23 macrumors 6502a Feb 25, 2007 524 0 Oct 28, 2007 #4 The 1.8Ghz is just Core Duo, whereas the 2.4 is Core 2 Duo, so you'll be able to get 64-bit functionality out of Leopard. Also, the 1.8Ghz uses an X1600 as it's graphic chip whereas the 2.4 uses an 8600M, which thoroughly whomps the X1600. There are also some smaller differences (LED screens, etc), but those are the two main ones that come to mind.
The 1.8Ghz is just Core Duo, whereas the 2.4 is Core 2 Duo, so you'll be able to get 64-bit functionality out of Leopard. Also, the 1.8Ghz uses an X1600 as it's graphic chip whereas the 2.4 uses an 8600M, which thoroughly whomps the X1600. There are also some smaller differences (LED screens, etc), but those are the two main ones that come to mind.