1366 ÷ 768 = 1.77864583 ≈ 16 ÷ 9, so yup, it's 16:9 just like most (all?) of their new displays.
Hm, it's like the 12" powerbook then, with a little less height and a lot more pixels on the width. But why did Steve say the 13.3" Air has more resolution than the 15" MacBook Pro, they are both the same, 1440x900?
Hm, it's like the 12" powerbook then, with a little less height and a lot more pixels on the width. But why did Steve say the 13.3" Air has more resolution than the 15" MacBook Pro, they are both the same, 1440x900?
1366x768 = 1,049,088 pixelsWhat he said was the 11.6" was higher res than the 13" MBP. I didn't think it was true, but it is when you consider it wider... although not as many vertically. But I am sure he didn't misspeak, so it must be more pixels overall. Didn't do the math, but I believe him.
Dontcha know resolution in Apple talk is DPI?
1366 ÷ 768 = 1.77864583 ≈ 16 ÷ 9, so yup, it's 16:9 just like most (all?) of their new displays.
Of course the 13 inch MBA is still 16:10 so... I guess Apple is nothing if not inconsistent.