Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MIDI_EVIL

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 23, 2006
1,320
14
UK
Sorry that I couldn't find this anywhere, but do we know if the 2.8 config uses the mobile version of the Core 2 Duo Extreme?

Rich.
 

MIDI_EVIL

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 23, 2006
1,320
14
UK
If you know the answer in one post, stop being so pedantic and posting the link to the Merom guides. You're being so much more awkward.

You'll never be chosen to be a moderator, so give it up bro.
 

rogersmj

macrumors 68020
Sep 10, 2006
2,169
36
Indianapolis, IN
I'm fairly certain that it's the desktop version. I don't even think there is a mobile version, is there? If so wouldn't the MBP use it? Someone confirm this for me.

Nope, it's the mobile version. The 2.8 is apparently the brand-spanking new C2E mobile chip. Also, a desktop chip and its cooling apparatus would never fit in that sexy-slim iMac case.
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,190
386
Indianapolis
If you know the answer in one post, stop being so pedantic and posting the link to the Merom guides. You're being so much more awkward.

You'll never be chosen to be a moderator, so give it up bro.
I created the guide in order to have a central point of information so that I wouldn't need to repeat myself. I don't find that the effort in making the guide has helped me repeat myself any less.

I'm not going to pay to be a mod as much I as love this forum and posting here.
 

MIDI_EVIL

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 23, 2006
1,320
14
UK
So according to this article on the 2.6 version of the Core 2 Duo Extreme mobile, Intel has removed overclocking limitations.

Any speculation on how much more we could get out of this 2.8 chip?

Rich.
 

timmillwood

macrumors 6502a
Apr 7, 2006
955
1
1. Why can't they put this processer in a MBP
2. If the difference betwee the 2.4 C2D and the 2.8 C2E is 400Mhz why not call them both C2D? There must be somthing Extreme about it? Cache? FSB? anything?
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,190
386
Indianapolis
1. Why can't they put this processer in a MBP
2. If the difference betwee the 2.4 C2D and the 2.8 C2E is 400Mhz why not call them both C2D? There must be somthing Extreme about it? Cache? FSB? anything?
Unlocked multiplier.

I'll wait until we can get a CPUID before we can say it's the X7800 or the X7900.
 

Sesshi

macrumors G3
Jun 3, 2006
8,113
1
One Nation Under Gordon
1. Why can't they put this processer in a MBP

Do you have a fireproof desk?

The Dell XPS M1730 I'll probably be upgrading my existing XPS's to will have the X7800 - and that will certainly be overclockable (i.e. the actual use for unlocked multipliers). Problem is of course you can't stick it inside a laptop that presumably - since I don't have an SR MBP yet - runs on the warm side already, and actually make use of the unlocked multipliers. If the M1710 is anything to go by, I should be able to run the X7800 rock-solid at ~3.2Ghz on the Dell. I doubt anything from Apple has that sort of design leeway though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.