Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

manowar

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 12, 2010
169
4
hi
i have a early 2009 Mac Pro 2.66 GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon
the ram is 1066 MHz DDR3

and the question i have is, whats the most Ram i run in this?
can i put x4 8GB sticks or even 16GB sticks?

cheers
 
hi
i have a early 2009 Mac Pro 2.66 GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon
the ram is 1066 MHz DDR3

and the question i have is, whats the most Ram i run in this?
can i put x4 8GB sticks or even 16GB sticks?

cheers

I have 16GB RAM sticks in mine..it'll take three, I'll likely try 4....

48GB to 64GB
 
If anyone can make four 16GB sticks work under OSX, I'd love to hear about it. As I understand it, only Windows will see four 16GB sticks in a single processor Mac Pro, and dual CPU models will only see six 16GB sticks in OSX.

Ooh, tongue-twister, haha! ^^^
 
If anyone can make four 16GB sticks work under OSX, I'd love to hear about it. As I understand it, only Windows will see four 16GB sticks in a single processor Mac Pro, and dual CPU models will only see six 16GB sticks in OSX.

Ooh, tongue-twister, haha! ^^^

From my reading on this it seems that early 16GB DIMMS were quad rank and that seemed to be the general explanation on why four wouldn't work, the guess was that dual rank DIMMS would likely work. I have no opinion on the matter because I just don't know. I have a dual rank 16GB DIMM in mine now over the next month or so I'll add 2 more. When that's done, I'll ask my local guy if he'll take the 4th one back. I don't need 64GB of RAM and the DIMMS cost 105 euro a pop, I can't/don't want to eat that 4th stick even if it does work.

These are what I'm putting in:

16384MB Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0

http://www.arlt.com/Hardware/PC-Kom...er/DDR3/16384MB-Samsung-M393B2G70BH0-CK0.html
 
Last edited:
Hey man.. good luck with those! Let us know if 16GB dimms will work.. that would be 64GB total.. Who knows if 32GB Dimms would work.. 32GB x 4 = 128GB, but highly doubt it. I am sure the Nehalem or Westmere 6-core has a limit on how much memory can be installed and recognized.. it is also controlled by the memory controller.

From my reading on this it seems that early 16GB DIMMS were quad rank and seemed to be the general explanation, the guess was that dual rank DIMMS would likely work. I have no opinion on the matter because I just don't know. I have a dual rank 16GB DIMM in mine now over the next month or so I'll add 2 more. When that's done, I'll ask my local guy if he'll take the 4th one back. I don't need 64GB of RAM and the DIMMS cost 105 euro a pop, I can't/don't want to eat that 4th stick even if it does work.

These are what I'm putting in:

16384MB Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0

http://www.arlt.com/Hardware/PC-Kom...er/DDR3/16384MB-Samsung-M393B2G70BH0-CK0.html
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.