It's more about how much power it draws under full load with turbo boost. Which is considerably higher than TDP. Although lower end models are closer to their target TDP. As they don't turbo boost as high.
Unfortunately there's no way I know of to set a limit to the turbo boost multiplier in macOS. It's either TB enabled or disabled. So, a 7700 with TB disabled may be what you are after.
This Tomshardware review shows where the 7700K, 7700, 7600K and 7600 land at full turbo under a stress test. Which is higher than your ever likely to see in the real world. At least it gives you a baseline of how bad it can get. Also that of a gaming load and heavy load.
Intel's Kaby Lake falls into the comes bearing the tuned 14nm+ process, a revamped graphics engine and a new chipset.
www.tomshardware.com
As you'll see there is a noticeable difference in power consumption between a 7700 and 7600 at various loads. Which would be more pronounced against your 7500. I'd expect with turbo boost disabled. That cooling a 7700 won't be much worse than a 7500.
As for a 7700t. It all depends on if Apple mothered to include the Microcode. If they did then it will work without issue. If they didn't you'll have the hair raising task of updating the microcode yourself. Which I wasn't even aware was possible with Macs. Until I spotted this thread.
I Just wanted to make a Quick posting that I managed to update the Microcode on my MacBook2,1 to the latest version intel has released for its CPU :) I managed to do this by dumping my MacBooks BootROM using flashrom in Linux and actually manually finding the microcode in the BootROM (which in...
forums.macrumors.com