Take a look at the 2008 Cinema Display — this is what the iMac could reasonably look like — all screen with a small Apple logo on the glass. It has speakers just like an iMac as well. Interesting that this was discontinued after only a few years.If you’re expecting the rendered to be real then you’ll probably be disappointed. It will probably look like the XDR but with a chin about half the size of the current one. I don’t see that going away, that’s where the vents and speakers are and it’s a branding thing. They want an Apple logo on the front.
And no it wont be as thick as an iPad and no it won’t be fanless. Even the Mini had a fan. It would be a very poor choice if it didn’t. The hump will surely be smaller but you still need thickness to house a heat sink and fan. I hope it has a large heat sink so it can stay as silent as possible.
I don’t think the “A14T” would be the M1X. I think it wouldn’t include a GPU on it if they’re going to ship a dedicated GPU with it. China Times calling it a “desktop” chip made me think that. I think it will have a fancy packaging substrate that will allow the CPU die and GPU die to use a single bank of memory just like the M1 SoC.M1X (A14T) with an Apple GPU (code name Lifuka) is rumored for the iMac.
My guess would be that an iMac for the masses, would be released first half of 2021 with an M1 chip, and keeping the current design. Apple seems to be rolling out M1 in the machines that sells the most. The high end Macbook Pros and iMac will get the love in the second half of 2021 IMHO.
2021 should give us native AS Adobe support, so you should find a Mac that fits your workflow. Welcome back to the Mac!I think the thing that can or will happen is non overheating iMac. That would be a big plus. I am very interested in where all of this is going to. Few years ago I moved away from Apple as my daily driver. So far, Win10 great to be honest. With the ARM move, Apple is back on my radar!
my daily workflow is hardcore Photoshop and illustrator. Sometimes huge files.
I agree ~ it probably makes sense to wait for the iMac if you don’t already have a good monitor.I’m thinking about getting the new Mac mini but it’s almost impossible to find a monitor as amazing as the current 4K is for less than 500 €. So then I’m wondering what’s the point of getting a Mac mini if I have to spend another 700 € in a good monitor, why not just wait and buy the new iMac. I’m super exited for the new iMac because of thermals, screen quality and power.
Yeah, the iMac design has really been pretty sharp since 2009. I think what we see over the next two years for the iMac will be remarkable.I would love for them to throw in 2 M1's or maybe M2?
I have hade 27" iMac since 2012. I love that form factor. But would not mind the rumoured 30"
No more Ram user -upgradable since the RAM is unified with the chipI would like to see user-upgradeable RAM and SSD. Otherwise we will end up in a situation, where the base models are far better value for money than comparable non-Apple computers, but expensive memory/storage upgrades make the high-end models very poor value for money.
I think you're expecting too much. Double the current M1? 3 external displays? Much more likely, IMHO, it will just be straight M1 based.The 24" iMac probably will have an M1X or something that will have around 8 perf cores and 4 eff one with the gpu on the SOC around 4-5 teraflops (around double than the current M1) that is twice the vega 20-3.2 teraflops , 1 bigger fan than the Mbp/mac mini and thats it, and it will be more than enough to outperform the M1 , have support for 3 external displays, and probably Apple will remove the usbA ports and let those just for the mac mini, and goes full only usb4 ports
What proportion of 21.5" iMac users do you think ever connect any external displays, let alone 2 or 3? It will be a tiny, tiny fraction. IMHO Apple wouldn't hesitate to degrade that capability in the interest of simplification and efficiency.since the current 21.5" iMac has an dGpu Vega 20...and has the ability to drive at least 2 or 3 external displays, Apple will not just place an M1 in that bigger enclosure...it will be a waste
Im betting that Apple what chip will place in the 24" iMac will be placed under 16" Macbook Pro
Apple dont want the first imac to run slower than the Macbook air or so since the M1 would drive an 24" 4K display instead of 1600p display
I'm not so sure about that. While other consumer-level Macs only have two memory modules, the 27" iMac has always had four. If Apple uses unified memory in the 27" iMac replacement, the memory capacity will drop by half.No more Ram user -upgradable since the RAM is unified with the chip
Ok, is just your opinion. But im sure, because its clearly you didnt watch the after WWDC event what Apple has to say. Unified memory is their future...and , i will not be shocked if Apple in 3 years will unified the storage too. the only in question to be somehow still modular is the upcoming "mac pro"I'm not so sure about that. While other consumer-level Macs only have two memory modules, the 27" iMac has always had four. If Apple uses unified memory in the 27" iMac replacement, the memory capacity will drop by half.
Also, unified memory will probably not work that well with higher-end GPUs. The M1 chip is said to have 68.25 GB/s memory bandwidth, while high-end consumer GPUs are in the 500 GB/s to 1 TB/s range. GPUs in general need relatively small amounts of very fast memory, while CPU workloads often benefit from larger amounts of more cost-effective memory.