Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

petermarks

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 29, 2006
8
0
Hello, I'm looking at purchasing a macbook pro and am wondering if the 256mb X1600 will be useful for non-gaming applications. I plan on using the computer to run osx and vista on a high resolution display (2560 x 1600 30"). Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!:)
 

petermarks

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 29, 2006
8
0
I should add that I won't be doing any crazy imaging or hd video work either.
 

thebeephaha

macrumors 6502
Sep 4, 2006
300
0
Seattle WA
Ur gonna need it for Vista but otherwise it will be kind of but its not like its really costing you anything extra. The price difference between the 128 and 256 model MBPs is mostly made up by the CPU.
 

clayj

macrumors 604
Jan 14, 2005
7,648
1,384
visiting from downstream
No, that's not overkill. With that kind of card, you should be able to run any resolution and color depth you want with good performance, and the Aero stuff in Vista will work really well.
 

ventro

macrumors 6502a
Sep 23, 2006
692
0
I am running a 30" ACD and a 256mb MacbookPro 2.33, and it cannot handle running Expose and Front Row at 60fps @ 2560x1600. It gets VERY choppy... but there is a fix.

How do you fix this? The problem is that unlike windows, OSX has this thing called "Beam (or Vertical) Sync" which tries to render every frame of animations within the operating system at the LCD monitor's refresh rate (60hz). You can read a bit further here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_sync

When the graphics card is incapable of rendering it at 60fps (frames per second), OSX tells the videocard to cut the frame rate of the animation down to a multiple of the refresh rate - 30fps. So then you get choppy animations.

Luckily, Beam Sync can be disabled. Read this link for instructions:

http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20050518113854620

So, if our X1600s are capable of rendering Expose at 45fps, we will see all 45 frames, even though we may get some tearing (a result of incorrect syncrhonisation of video data and the monitor refresh rate), but it's much less annoying than a choppy expose.

So yes, running 2560x1600 WILL HEAVILY tax your video card, and you will need all the video "punch" that you can get. So definitely get the 256.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.