vv-tim said:
Any ram that costs more than $500 isn't "cheap". I'm sure they guarantee that thing to work on any computer that claims to support 4GB.
Just because it's not Crucial or Corsair doesn't mean it sucks (or for that matter -- just because it IS Crucial or Corsair doesn't mean it's great).
Most RAM companies make varying types of RAM for overclockers, not for normal users... and part of the different types of RAM is all about marketing -- not actual performance difference.
And the MacBook Pro runs fine on 533mhz ram. The chipset supports either. I'm running 2GB of 533.
Well, considering the going rate is $1500 per DIMM, $500 should be considered cheap. Also, Apple DOESN'T claim the Intel based Macs support 4GB...the opposite in fact.
I'm not saying that it won't work because it's generic...I'm just saying that to get a machine that unofficially doesn't support 4GB to work with that much, someone is going to have to sit down with all sorts of different quality of ram and try it out, not just one person who tried one stick of generic ram in a machine that doesn't officially support it.
Sure, 533MHz RAM may work in the machine, but site provides no other information. What are the latency timings, etc. on that stick? Officially, Apple says it must be DDR2-667...if you stray from that, it MAY cause problems. So if someone is testing a larger than supported DIMM, at lower than supportted speeds, with DIMMs of unknown quality, we can't make ANY conclusions about the support of Intel based Macs.
Not only that, you're missing the point...all I was saying is that someone needs to sit down with some high quality RAM that exceeds the specs required (possibly many different kits to try), and see if it's even possible to do with the absolute best equipment money can buy. Once it is show that it will work with that, then we can talk about finding some cheaper alternatives.