Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

8thMan

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 17, 2006
163
0
Now that the MBP has been bumped up to 2gigs, how long will it be before the Mac Pro follows suit? 1gig is starting to look a bit embarrassing now...
 

Spanky Deluxe

macrumors demi-god
Mar 17, 2005
5,285
1,789
London, UK
8thMan said:
Now that the MBP has been bumped up to 2gigs, how long will it be before the Mac Pro follows suit? 1gig is starting to look a bit embarrassing now...

Considering the cost of RAM for the Mac Pros right now I'd imagine they'd wait a while. They'd take a much bigger hit selling a Mac Pro with 2GB ram for the same price as one with 1GB ram as apposed to selling a MacBook Pro with 2GB ram for the same price as one with 1GB ram before the upgrade. The G5 was stuck at 512MB base right up to the end, even the G5 Quad came with 512MB as standard if I remember correctly.
 

I'mAMac

macrumors 6502a
Aug 28, 2006
786
0
In a Mac box
8thMan said:
Now that the MBP has been bumped up to 2gigs, how long will it be before the Mac Pro follows suit? 1gig is starting to look a bit embarrassing now...
I agree they should definitley bump the Mac Pro up to 2gb. A machine like that and costing that much should have 2 gigs. Not that 1 gig is bad, its just everything else in the machine is like really amazing and then 1gb.
 

Willis

macrumors 68020
Apr 23, 2006
2,293
54
Beds, UK
I'mAMac said:
I agree they should definitley bump the Mac Pro up to 2gb. A machine like that and costing that much should have 2 gigs. Not that 1 gig is bad, its just everything else in the machine is like really amazing and then 1gb.

tell me about it... Apple just love to eat my money. Upgraded to 2Gb, but gonna add more later on in the game when the dimms get cheaper.
 

~Shard~

macrumors P6
Jun 4, 2003
18,377
48
1123.6536.5321
I would like to see this as well, but keep in mind the FB-DIMMs the Mac Pro uses are quite expensive. It will still be a while before we see this in the Mac Pro as a result I'm guessing...
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
~Shard~ said:
I would like to see this as well, but keep in mind the FB-DIMMs the Mac Pro uses are quite expensive. It will still be a while before we see this in the Mac Pro as a result I'm guessing...

i agree. 2 x 1GB is really expensive. even if they did 4 x 512, it'd still be another $200 at least right now
 

8thMan

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 17, 2006
163
0
I was just wondering if there was any other time in Apple history when its top laptop come with more RAM than its top desktop. :confused:
 

CanadaRAM

macrumors G5
My guess at what happened is that Apple contracted for a huge number of DDR2-667 SODIMMs, and got a fixed price deal on them BEFORE DDR2 prices started going insane. This gives them the ability to increase the perceived value of the machine without incurring extra cost. So lets say the RAM cost them $1 at the same time other vendors were charging $1 -- no advantage. But when the same RAM costs them $1 and other vendors are charging $1.40, then it becomes a strategic advantage to include it rather than to drop the price of the machine -- because people will look at it and say "I'm getting $1.40 worth of RAM", not $1.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.