Can anyone tell me about shooting pictures with 3:2 image size as opposed to the VGA type. Probably, a very dumb question. What exactly does 3:2 mean? The pictures I took with that selected appear to be much better than the regular email file type.
What exactly does 3:2 mean? The pictures I took with that selected appear to be much better than the regular email file type.
I'm not sure why the 3:2 ratio exists on SLR's as to where the history comes from on using that aspect ratio but all I know is that it pisses me off when I need to crop things down to 8x10 which is like a ~5:4 ratio.
Loosing 2" from 8x12 to 8x10 actually really is annoying.
4x6 - works with 3:2
5x7 - works for the most part with a .5" crop from 3:2
8x10 what a bitch if you got details on the edges of the photo you might want to keep or have a nice wide angle (landscape for example) and the 8x10 just doesnt retain the wide feel.
I'm not sure why the 3:2 ratio exists on SLR's as to where the history comes from on using that aspect ratio
Agreed - I wish the damn printers would offer more sizes along the lines of a 3:2 ratio, as there are quite a bit of photos where the cropping is very minimal or even non-existent.
Oskar Barnack of Leica is the man responsible for the ratio of modern 35mm film from most accounts.
Now, the stories are that the 3:2 ratio was selected because it is closest to the Golden Rectangle (rectangle that follows the Golden Ratio), believing this proportion to be aesthetically pleasing. Or, while adapting the prevalent 35mm film used by the movie industry for use in still cameras, he was pleased with the quality of the print, but not quite satisfied with the small size, and came up with a simple solution by doubling the frame into 24x36. Either way, the rest is history.
That is exactly it. In the old days the 35mm format was called "double frame". Movie film travels through the camera vertically and the frame was about 24mm wide. When you turn the film side ways and run it left to right the frame is now 24mm tall and you can make it as wide as you like. Bigger always gives more quality and if yo don't need the width you can crop.
With a digital camera, I think the ideal sensor would be round. It would have pixels that cover the entire image circle of the lens and then you crop, inside the camera with a selector switch for 9:16, 2:3, 4:5 and 1:1. and an other selector switch for vertical or landscape shots. There should be no reason to ever turn the camers on end. Like I wrote above I'd likely only use 9:16, 1:1 and 5:4.
BTW, no sensor now or in the furture can ever to more then one format native. Pixels are physical devices. What you see as "native" is really an in-body crop..