Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
Does anyone know of photo software /photo application besides Photoshop, that supports 30-bits colours (10-bit per channel)? iMac supports it, my Eizo supports it; all hardware is good to go, but there doesn't seem to be any photo application/software that can actually show this on screen, beside Photoshop?
Or maybe there is?
Thank you!
 

gilby101

macrumors 68030
Mar 17, 2010
2,946
1,630
Tasmania
Do you really need 10 bit per channel? Most general purpose photo editors I know (e.g. Pixelmator, Acorn, Affinity, Photoshop) work in either 8 or 16 bit. So work in 16-bit and let your GPU and monitor do their best.
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
I obviously don' t need it as much as food and water, but I would like my iMac and especially my Eizo do what they' re (also) made for. See what I' m doing to the max, before printing.
More colours and more able to edit before artefacts show up (like banding)
 
Last edited:

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
Thank you. Can GIMP actually display10-bit per channel display color depth? (So 30-bit deep colour display)?
So, more color range, better gradients, no banding (or much less banding)?
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
Maybe I' m wrong here, but there' s more software that can actually process 8-bit/16-bit/32-bit files. Many times though it can not display 10-bit colour (same as many monitors cannot). Displaying is different from processing.
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
Well, you can tell the difference by looking at it. Without such software, in images/photos banding is visible much sooner. Also less details in shadows. Working/editing photo files is much more effective when seeing all those colour nuances. More monitors are 10-bit colour capable (bit depth), but that' s hardly any good if the software isn' t cable of showing this. iMac 5k screens have 30-bits color (ARGB2101010) since a few years already. I' m actually looking for a (photo) application that can display this for grading images....beside Photoshop (which seems to be the only photo).
Just to illustrate....(for video)...only posted today in DPReview:

 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
I know Photoshop works. Don' t want to use that and that's why I asked for software other than Photoshop. I doubt GIMP can do this (reading information on internet), but I can try.
Thank you.
 

gilby101

macrumors 68030
Mar 17, 2010
2,946
1,630
Tasmania
Seems to me you are mixing up processing and displaying.

All the photo processing apps I have tried (see my earlier post) can process in at least both 8 and 16 bit. So process in 16 bit.

Is your question really about how to get macOS and your Eizo to work together and display in better than 8 bit?

Well, you can tell the difference by looking at it. Without such software, in images/photos banding is visible much sooner. Also less details in shadows. Working/editing photo files is much more effective when seeing all those colour nuances. More monitors are 10-bit colour capable (bit depth), but that' s hardly any good if the software isn' t cable of showing this. iMac 5k screens have 30-bits color (ARGB2101010) since a few years already. I' m actually looking for a (photo) application that can display this for grading images....beside Photoshop (which seems to be the only photo).
Just to illustrate....(for video)...only posted today in DPReview:

I don't see why this is relevant. Is this thread about video or photo? Your opening post suggests still photo. And that link is about the recording steps, not processing or displaying. Most moderately decent cameras take photos with 12 to 14 bits.
 

HDFan

Contributor
Jun 30, 2007
7,290
3,339
Just to illustrate....(for video)...only posted today in DPReview:

Not a good example. The 8 bit shot is clearly sub par with off colors. Maybe that's typical for a drone camera, but that is not a picture that any decent camera would take.
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
@gilby101 . It’s about photo. The example is not good. I should not have posted that. Sorry about that. You’re right in that most cameras can take images with 12/14 bits.
It’s about photo software that can actually display 10/30-bit colours. not about iMac and Eizo working together to get more than 8-bit. Only the photo software that I can work in (and is capable of showing 10-bit bpc on my capable screens).
I hope, I made myself clear now and no more (and not bring in more confusion)
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
Not a good example. The 8 bit shot is clearly sub par with off colors. Maybe that's typical for a drone camera, but that is not a picture that any decent camera would take.
@HDFan . You’re absolutely right. That example was not good. On iPhone yesterday and busy. Should not have posted that quickly.
Sorry about that
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
Seems to me you are mixing up processing and displaying.

All the photo processing apps I have tried (see my earlier post) can process in at least both 8 and 16 bit. So process in 16 bit.

Is your question really about how to get macOS and your Eizo to work together and display in better than 8 bit?


I don't see why this is relevant. Is this thread about video or photo? Your opening post suggests still photo. And that link is about the recording steps, not processing or displaying. Most moderately decent cameras take photos with 12 to 14 bits.
Just to quote a poster on another website (he' s probably clearer than I am):

"...8bit/10bit is viewing bit depth (between your GPU and display). It tells how smooth gradients will be as there will be more colors in 10bit mode because there are no longer 256 gradation steps but 1024.

Another thing is archiving bit depth (document mode). It may be RGB/8, RGB/16, RGB32, etc. It determines how color data will be stored in file when saved.

So we may find ourselves working with RGB/8 document on a 30bit display and we also may work with RGB/16 image on a cheap 6bit+FRC display which is barely reaches 24bit with frame rate control.

As far as I know, Photoshop does support 30bit viewing mode. At least it does on my Mac system. Gradients are much smoother in this mode....."
 

bogdanw

macrumors 603
Mar 10, 2009
6,114
3,021
As far as I know, Photoshop does support 30bit viewing mode. At least it does on my Mac system.
Can we get an official source for that?
I couldn’t find Adobe explicitly telling what viewing modes Photoshop supports.
Bit depth https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/bit-depth.html
High dynamic range images https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/high-dynamic-range-images.html
Gradients are much smoother in this mode....."
Is there an objective way of telling what an app displays?
 

Dutch60

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 18, 2019
221
80
I don' t know what official source you' re looking for, but according to Eizo Netherlands who I contacted this week, to their knowledge Photoshop is the only application/software that can actually show 30-bit colours. That they where certain of. They'll look for possible other software as well..and contact me again. I hope, that' s a promise they' ll keep.
Some articles with information:
1.
(This is an older article...Photoshop is mentioned in here)
2.
3.
(from Eizo)
4.
(older information still)

(and more about this on the internet).


I also found this discussion on Adobe forums interesting:

As for: "....Gradients are much smoother in this mode....." ....that is according to another poster on another website who obviously uses Photoshop and has a 10-bit monitor.
 

bogdanw

macrumors 603
Mar 10, 2009
6,114
3,021
I don' t know what official source you' re looking for
An official source is Adobe or another developer of an app that does what you are looking for.
Opinions from the Internet are many https://photo.stackexchange.com/a/48324
digiKam supports 16 bits/channel images, is a free image management package supports colour management. It is also available for Windows & Mac. I suspect it is exactly what you are looking for.
Keep an eye open for the release of GIMP 2.10 - no fixed due date yet - as this is expected to be using the GEGL engine and working in your choice of 8 bit/channel, 16 bit/channel or 32 bits/channel in integer or float format, see here.
digiKam https://www.digikam.org
 

gilby101

macrumors 68030
Mar 17, 2010
2,946
1,630
Tasmania
Maybe I' m wrong here, but there' s more software that can actually process 8-bit/16-bit/32-bit files. Many times though it can not display 10-bit colour (same as many monitors cannot). Displaying is different from processing.
Sorry, I was too direct in my earlier posts and caused/showed confusion.

Based on the gradient png linked by @Superhai, and looking mostly at the grey, by eyeballing my results are:

Does display 10 bit: Photoshop 2022, Lightroom Classic, Pixelmator Pro, Acorn, Aurora HDR 2018, Apple Photos, Safari, Preview.
Only 8 Bit display: Affinity Photo (that surprised me), Digikam, Brave, Firefox.
All the photo editors above can process in 16 bit or better (not sure about Photos).
I have deliberately included some browsers and Preview.
With exception of Aurora HDR 2018, all apps with current version running on macOS 12.5.1 and iMac 2019 27".

So my recommendation for a suitable 10-bit display photo editing app is Pixelmator Pro which is functionally similar to photo editing with Photoshop. But maybe test Photos first as it is free.
 
Last edited:

gilby101

macrumors 68030
Mar 17, 2010
2,946
1,630
Tasmania
Have you tried looking at a 30 bit (or more) image in Safari? My results was based on eyeballing the gradient linked before (and other similar), and not on what browser scripting is reporting to a web server.

I don't know much about javacripting, but https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/prop_screen_colordepth.asp says values for colour.depth are 1, 4, 8, 15, 16, 24, 32, or 48. So not surprising that javascript says only 24 bits per pixel.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.