320M vs ATI 4670

[vslo]

Whats up,
I was wondering about it... the old low-end iMac used to have a 9400M GPU. The 320M is the successor of 9400M, but the new low-end imac has the 4670.
How does the 4670 compare to the 320M ?

 

[Hellhammer]

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-4670.13881.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-320M.28701.0.html

ATI 4670 is roughly 50% faster. 320M can't be used with iX CPUs due licensing issues plus a discrete GPU is a must for desktop IMO

 

[vslo]

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-4670.13881.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-320M.28701.0.html

ATI 4670 is roughly 50% faster. 320M can't be used with iX CPUs due licensing issues plus a discrete GPU is a must for desktop IMO

Only 50%? I though it was at least 100% better. It is waaaaay smother than a 320M !