Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

narvin

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 28, 2016
1
0
Uk
I have the code bellow , which is for subtracting the 3D matrix from 2D.
Code:
import java.util.*;
class test28{

public static void main ( String[] args ) {


    int [][][] arr1 = {{{6,3,9,0},{8,6,5,3},{5, 4, 6, 7}}};

     int [][] arr2= {{6,3,5,0},{8,6,5,3}};

    test28 test = new test28();

       System.out.println(Arrays.deepToString(test.subtract(arr1,arr2)));

}
public static int [][] subtract(int[][][] a, int[][] b)  {
        int[][] diff = new int[a[0].length][a[0][0].length];
      for ( int j=0; j<a[0].length; j++){
              for ( int k=0; k<a[0][0].length; k++){

          diff[j][k] = a[0][j][k]- b[j][k];
        }
}
return diff;
}
}
*************************************************************************************

Iam receiving error which is IndexOutOfBound
 
Last edited by a moderator:

chown33

Moderator
Staff member
Aug 9, 2009
11,003
8,900
A sea of green
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_addition#Entrywise_sum
"Two matrices must have an equal number of rows and columns to be added."​

Do your matrices meet this requirement?

If you think they do, then add comments to your code that identify the rows. An example of code with comments added is:
Code:
int [][] arr2 = {
{6,3,5,0},  // row 0, has 4 columns
{8,6,5,3}  // row 1, has 4 columns
};  // 2 rows total, 4 columns total

If you think your code doesn't meet the requirement, then figure out what to change and where, so the matrices are subtractable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eraserhead

Amazing Iceman

macrumors 603
Nov 8, 2008
5,861
4,673
Florida, U.S.A.
I think the problem is that you are using .length instead of .count in your for-loops, as in here:

for ( int j=0; j<a[0].length; j++){

Same may go to the other loop.
To be sure, use NSLog to output the value of j to the Console.
 

dylanryan

macrumors member
Aug 21, 2011
57
2
I think the problem is that you are using .length instead of .count in your for-loops, as in here:

for ( int j=0; j<a[0].length; j++){

Same may go to the other loop.
To be sure, use NSLog to output the value of j to the Console.

This is clearly Java code, not Objective C, so length is the correct way to see how large an array is.

That said, you are iterating over the wrong length. Looking at the code, here are some lengths that I would expect:

arr1.length => 1
arr1[0].length => 3
arr1[0][0].length => 4

arr2.length => 2
arr2[0].length => 4


Now, lets take this loop, and see what happens at the extreme cases

Code:
 for ( int j=0; j<a[0].length; j++){
              for ( int k=0; k<a[0][0].length; k++){

          diff[j][k] = a[0][j][k]- b[j][k];
        }


So, j will go up to 2 at the largest (and k will go up to 3).
So, when j=2, then we try to access arr2[2][k], but arr2's length is 2, so the only valid indices are 0 and 1. There is no 2, hence the index out of bounds exception

Incidentally, I am not sure why arr1 is a 3D array. You only need 2 dimensions to store a matrix, no matter how many dimensions there are in the matrix. A 50-dimentional matrix fits comfortably in a 2D array.
 

Amazing Iceman

macrumors 603
Nov 8, 2008
5,861
4,673
Florida, U.S.A.
This is clearly Java code, not Objective C, so length is the correct way to see how large an array is.

That said, you are iterating over the wrong length. Looking at the code, here are some lengths that I would expect:

arr1.length => 1
arr1[0].length => 3
arr1[0][0].length => 4

arr2.length => 2
arr2[0].length => 4


Now, lets take this loop, and see what happens at the extreme cases

Code:
 for ( int j=0; j<a[0].length; j++){
              for ( int k=0; k<a[0][0].length; k++){

          diff[j][k] = a[0][j][k]- b[j][k];
        }


So, j will go up to 2 at the largest (and k will go up to 3).
So, when j=2, then we try to access arr2[2][k], but arr2's length is 2, so the only valid indices are 0 and 1. There is no 2, hence the index out of bounds exception

Incidentally, I am not sure why arr1 is a 3D array. You only need 2 dimensions to store a matrix, no matter how many dimensions there are in the matrix. A 50-dimentional matrix fits comfortably in a 2D array.

My bad, i wasn't paying too much attention. I thought it was Objective-C.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.