5982 3DMarks SM2.0 Score: 2112 HDR/SM3.0 Score: 2343 CPU Score: 4127
K Kunimodi macrumors member Original poster Sep 8, 2006 65 0 Ashland, OR, USA Sep 9, 2006 #1 5982 3DMarks SM2.0 Score: 2112 HDR/SM3.0 Score: 2343 CPU Score: 4127
H hal0n macrumors regular Dec 27, 2004 102 0 Sep 9, 2006 #2 Kunimodi said: 5982 3DMarks SM2.0 Score: 2112 HDR/SM3.0 Score: 2343 CPU Score: 4127 Click to expand... O RLY?!
Kunimodi said: 5982 3DMarks SM2.0 Score: 2112 HDR/SM3.0 Score: 2343 CPU Score: 4127 Click to expand... O RLY?!
Laslo Panaflex macrumors 65816 May 1, 2003 1,291 0 Tokyo Sep 9, 2006 #3 Kunimodi said: 5982 3DMarks SM2.0 Score: 2112 HDR/SM3.0 Score: 2343 CPU Score: 4127 Click to expand... I read that somone else got 6010, I don't think they were running xp64 though.
Kunimodi said: 5982 3DMarks SM2.0 Score: 2112 HDR/SM3.0 Score: 2343 CPU Score: 4127 Click to expand... I read that somone else got 6010, I don't think they were running xp64 though.
D damado macrumors 6502 Aug 8, 2006 280 0 Sep 9, 2006 #4 Yeah that was me, I got a 6010 with the catalyst 6.8 drivers in XP Pro.
K Kunimodi macrumors member Original poster Sep 8, 2006 65 0 Ashland, OR, USA Sep 9, 2006 #5 damado said: Yeah that was me, I got a 6010 with the catalyst 6.8 drivers in XP Pro. Click to expand... Cool! It is interesting that the CPU score is where the difference is. 3DMark is (currently) a 32-bit program, so I wouldn't expect it be faster in XP64, but... Maybe Fedex gave your Mac Pro spider powers when they lost it.
damado said: Yeah that was me, I got a 6010 with the catalyst 6.8 drivers in XP Pro. Click to expand... Cool! It is interesting that the CPU score is where the difference is. 3DMark is (currently) a 32-bit program, so I wouldn't expect it be faster in XP64, but... Maybe Fedex gave your Mac Pro spider powers when they lost it.