Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iW00t

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Nov 7, 2006
3,286
0
Defenders of Apple Guild
With the latest PMA it seems like we now have a new 450D that has newer features than the 40D!

Does this mean we can expect a 40D replacement soon?
 

zioxide

macrumors 603
Dec 11, 2006
5,737
3,726
The 40D just came out in like September.

I think the 5D is next for an update.
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,870
903
Location Location Location
"ZOMG, 12 Megapixels!!!"

If you think the 40D is in dire need for an update only 5 months after release, you really haven't seen the photos produced by that camera. Now go and take some photos, and stop worrying about such things.
 

jbernie

macrumors 6502a
Nov 25, 2005
927
12
Denver, CO
"ZOMG, 12 Megapixels!!!"

If you think the 40D is in dire need for an update only 5 months after release, you really haven't seen the photos produced by that camera. Now go and take some photos, and stop worrying about such things.

Given the photos i was able to take with a friends 30D on my recent trip the 40D's improvements can't need an update so soon.


Regarding the OP, the 450 is a very good entry level camera, but when really pushed the 40D can still win in many areas, start with the frames per second where the 40D just about doubles the 450 and can do it for longer.
 

iW00t

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Nov 7, 2006
3,286
0
Defenders of Apple Guild
I have been using a 20D for quite a while and it is getting quite long in the tooth.

The 450D does look tempting though, with its higher ISO sensitivity and stuff as well as the newer image processor, but do all those features really matter in real world usage?
 

Roy Hobbs

macrumors 68000
Apr 29, 2005
1,862
286
I have been using a 20D for quite a while and it is getting quite long in the tooth.

The 450D does look tempting though, with its higher ISO sensitivity and stuff as well as the newer image processor, but do all those features really matter in real world usage?


If you're used to a 20D upgrade to the 40D, don't step down to the 450D(xsi). The 450 may have more megapixels but it is a toy when compared to the 40D
 

iW00t

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Nov 7, 2006
3,286
0
Defenders of Apple Guild
If you're used to a 20D upgrade to the 40D, don't step down to the 450D(xsi). The 450 may have more megapixels but it is a toy when compared to the 40D

Can you please elaborate a bit more?

Cos ultimately I am not a pro photographer, I shoot a lot of stills so features like a larger buffer don't really bug me.

What would I be missing out on with the XSi?
 

miloblithe

macrumors 68020
Nov 14, 2003
2,072
28
Washington, DC
The 40D has a much bigger, brighter viewfinder (.95x vrs .87x). It shoots a 6.5 fps vrs 3.5. ISO 3200 mx vrs ISO 1600. Better autofocus system (all points cross type. XSI only has cross type at center). Wider metering range. 1/8000 second shutter vrs 1/4000. Shutter life rated to 100,000 exposures vrs 50,000. Flash sync 1/250 vrs 1/200. Shorter black out time (just a guess). Kelvin white balance adjustment. Different focusing screens available. Custom shooting modes on dial. sRAW. Wireless connectivity.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.