Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kaufman

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 28, 2010
34
0
I'll keep this simple and hope someone can help.

I'm purchasing a Mac Pro this year.
I doubt I'll be able to afford the new model that come out and I know the pricing structure that companies offer when upgrading the old towers so don't need help there.

What I'd love to know is..
If it were you, would you buy the either the following for writing music in Logic Pro.
I'll be using many VI instruments.

8 Core 3.0ghz
12 core 2.4ghz

These would be same price hence my trepidation since it's the old cores vs processor question.


Everything else, Ram e.t.c would be the same. It's the processor I want to know about.

Any advice, or experiences much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
If you are in the market for one, you should have a good idea of what you are getting into. My personal preference would be for faster single-core speed. Beyond that, I'm not taking the bait.

(If serious, a less wrath-of-trash-can title, etc., would help. This place is badly-off enough already without another "but it's 4 years old, obsolete and overpriced!" troll-worthy thread.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: T'hain Esh Kelch
I'll keep this simple and hope someone can help.

I'm purchasing a Mac Pro this year.
I doubt I'll be able to afford the new model that come out and I know the pricing structure that companies offer when upgrading the old towers so don't need help there.

What I'd love to know is..
If it were you, would you buy the either the following for writing music in Logic Pro.
I'll be using many VI instruments.

8 Core 3.0ghz
12 core 2.4ghz

These would be same price hence my trepidation

Everything else, Ram e.t.c would be the same. It's the processor I want to know about.

Any advice, or experiences much appreciated.

Trash Can of worms opened.....Begin
Just buy it man....nothing else to say.
 
I'd go with the faster machine.

More cores do help. But if we're already talking 8 cores, then you'll benefit from the faster speed more than if you had more cores at a lower speed.
 
Just buy it man....nothing else to say.

Thanks for the reply. The only problem is I quoted two machine. Cheers though.
[doublepost=1483966327][/doublepost]
I'd go with the faster machine.

More cores do help. But if we're already talking 8 cores, then you'll benefit from the faster speed more than if you had more cores at a lower speed.

Thank you, that seems to be the general feeling after searching various forums.
Just thought it would be worth posting here.
[doublepost=1483967417][/doublepost]
If you are in the market for one, you should have a good idea of what you are getting into. My personal preference would be for faster single-core speed. Beyond that, I'm not taking the bait.

(If serious, a less wrath-of-trash-can title, etc., would help. This place is badly-off enough already without another "but it's 4 years old, obsolete and overpriced!" troll-worthy thread.)

Duly noted. Title amended.
Agreed, I'm not interested in the 2017 models that are pure speculation.
I'm also not interesting to hear about the older Mac Pro's

Just these two models from the 2013 range.

Thanks for the replies
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.