damienvfx macrumors regular Original poster Jul 28, 2006 143 0 Los Angeles, CA Sep 27, 2006 #1 Not for a few more years, pretty impressive considering we are only on 2 right now. http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=302
Not for a few more years, pretty impressive considering we are only on 2 right now. http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=302
spicyapple macrumors 68000 Jul 20, 2006 1,724 1 Sep 27, 2006 #2 We're at gigascale computing but it still takes me 20 seconds to launch Photoshop. What's up with that?
We're at gigascale computing but it still takes me 20 seconds to launch Photoshop. What's up with that?
stoid macrumors 601 Feb 17, 2002 4,312 29 So long, and thanks for all the fish! Sep 27, 2006 #3 spicyapple said: We're at gigascale computing but it still takes me 20 seconds to launch Photoshop. What's up with that? Click to expand... Unfortunately a faster processor does not speed up your hard drive access time. You're right though, I think that Adobe should have to pay a load-up tax to all customers for the unwieldy load times of CS2.
spicyapple said: We're at gigascale computing but it still takes me 20 seconds to launch Photoshop. What's up with that? Click to expand... Unfortunately a faster processor does not speed up your hard drive access time. You're right though, I think that Adobe should have to pay a load-up tax to all customers for the unwieldy load times of CS2.