darbsrewop said:
Why is Omniweb good? Why should I pay?
Why should
you pay? I have no idea. And if you don't know either, then you shouldn't.
For me, mainly it is OmniWeb's feature set.
Usability of an application in Mac OS X is a water shed when making a choice. And the first question I usually ask is
is it a Cocoa application? (or, more to the point, does it support services?)
The problem with Carbon based browsers is that I can't use services with them. When writing a post in those browsers I wouldn't have access to spell checking (which all my main apps share), or OmniDictionary, or Nisus Thesaurus, or WordService. When browsing the web I wouldn't have access to RBrowser or WebGrabber or MacJournal. Basically, I'd be cut off from the rest of my system.
Now, that may not seem like much, but being a long time NeXT/Rhapsody/Mac OS X user... the whole isolated application environment of the old Mac OS/Windows/Linux world is just not for me. Besides, multi-platform apps can only be as good as the worst environment that they run on. I, as a Mac OS X user, don't think I should have to suffer from the low expectations of other platforms.
So, in the area of web browsers that pretty much limits the field. My main choices would be Safari or OmniWeb. As OmniWeb has features I can't live without now (zoomed text fields, thumbnail browsing, live code editing, click-and-hold contextual menus, etc.), it was worth it to me.
Besides, I've been using it happily for years.
Basically, that's where I stand. But when setting up systems for other people, I load just about every browser there is on those systems and let them come to their own conclusions. Browsers are a thing of choice... and we have a lot of choices in Mac OS X.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big Grin :D :D"