Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tommiy

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 11, 2015
412
127
With the new announcement, I thought I would look at trading in my mid 2017 maxed out MBP. It cost just short of $4000AUD just that short time ago. Imagine my amazement at filling in the Apple trade-in calculator to be informed that the trade-in value is now $0 but I can freely send it in to be recycled and that they would send me an envelope to provide the machine to them. I'm not sure why I would now invest in a new machine that obviously holds such little value in retention after a short 3 years. It feels like I'm supposed to be impressed that Apple is happy to take this obvious clunker off my hands at their cost.
 

acidfast7_redux

Suspended
Nov 10, 2020
567
521
uk
That's Apple's perspective.

Last time I check, they didn't control the entire used market.

My current city has at least two independent Mac resellers that have stacks of MacBooks and iMac and they hold their value quite well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanpete

kucharsk

macrumors regular
May 31, 2016
157
96
That's Apple's perspective.

Last time I check, they didn't control the entire used market.

My current city has at least two independent Mac resellers that have stacks of MacBooks and iMac and they hold their value quite well.

That's fine, but I certainly wouldn't buy a used computer that old.
 

ght56

macrumors 6502a
Aug 31, 2020
839
815
That value probably comes from a third party company and not Apple, and the value itself may be based on trade volume. If it is, the $0 figure could be an outcome of how many trades they have already gotten as they have likely gotten quite a surge.

There are other companies (and independent sellers) that purchase Macs as well besides the third party company that purchases them from Apple's website.
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,518
19,669
It makes no sense for Apple to buy your 2017 MBP, especially since the yesterday's announcement. They can't resell it. Why can't you sell it privately?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saturn007

playtech1

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2014
695
889
eBay in the UK has 2017 MBPs selling for around £1300, so clearly a better route than Apple's trade in scheme, which has always offered terrible prices and stinks of greenwashing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saturn007

Moakesy

macrumors 6502a
Mar 1, 2013
576
1,209
UK
One of the reasons I buy Apple is that they hold their value so well.

It's not that your machine has zero value, it's that they (either Apple or a 3rd party) don't want to buy it and so has zero value to them.

Every MBP I've owned I've sold on for a considerable sum after 3 or 4 years. A quick search on eBay for sold listings shows what 2017 machines are going for (UK pricing)...

1605084141865.png


Just do a bit of homework and the money is there....
 

coredev

macrumors 6502a
Sep 26, 2012
586
1,250
Bavaria
Still using the first revision Retina MBP 15", which I maxed out when I got it.
Not sure what Apple thinks it is worth by now, but then I have no intention to sell it yet.
 

Moakesy

macrumors 6502a
Mar 1, 2013
576
1,209
UK
I'm not sure why I would now invest in a new machine that obviously holds such little value in retention after a short 3 years. It feels like I'm supposed to be impressed that Apple is happy to take this obvious clunker off my hands at their cost.

Actually, you're right. Go and buy a Windows machine from Dell, HP etc......I reckon you'd get what.....75% of the value back from those guys after 3 years.

Damn Apple and their failure to support their customers!! ???.
 

Kierkegaarden

Cancelled
Dec 13, 2018
2,424
4,137
With the new announcement, I thought I would look at trading in my mid 2017 maxed out MBP. It cost just short of $4000AUD just that short time ago. Imagine my amazement at filling in the Apple trade-in calculator to be informed that the trade-in value is now $0 but I can freely send it in to be recycled and that they would send me an envelope to provide the machine to them. I'm not sure why I would now invest in a new machine that obviously holds such little value in retention after a short 3 years. It feels like I'm supposed to be impressed that Apple is happy to take this obvious clunker off my hands at their cost.
That doesn’t make sense, even from Apple. For comparison, I put my base level 2017 Air and was shown $310 trade in value. Yours should be much more than that. But as others have said — you may fare better selling directly (especially if Apple is only offering zero!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: me55

jqc

macrumors 6502
Jun 30, 2007
394
204
I was quoted $160 on my 2013 13” MBP from Apple’s trade in page.
 

Ocnetgeek

macrumors regular
Sep 1, 2018
185
105
Oak Creek, WI
With the new announcement, I thought I would look at trading in my mid 2017 maxed out MBP. It cost just short of $4000AUD just that short time ago. Imagine my amazement at filling in the Apple trade-in calculator to be informed that the trade-in value is now $0 but I can freely send it in to be recycled and that they would send me an envelope to provide the machine to them. I'm not sure why I would now invest in a new machine that obviously holds such little value in retention after a short 3 years. It feels like I'm supposed to be impressed that Apple is happy to take this obvious clunker off my hands at their cost.

That seems wrong and maybe they updated things recently. Several months ago I was looking too trade in my 2015 MacBook Pro and the trade in calculator told me that it was worth $610. I ended up selling privately for more but hard to understand why they are giving you that price.
 

UltimateSyn

macrumors 601
Mar 3, 2008
4,967
9,205
Massachusetts
Were trade-in values adjusted yesterday? I got $710 locked in for my 2016 rMBP (512GB SSD, 16GB RAM) right after pre-orders went live.

Did you perhaps accidentally say 'No' to the question about the enclosure being free from warping and swelling, or something?
 

kucharsk

macrumors regular
May 31, 2016
157
96
I must live in an alternate reality. My laptop is almost 9 years old. I'm still not buying a new one. You could definitely get something if you sell it private market. Apple just has its own ideas on what they are worth.

Something that old is no longer supported and no longer runs the latest version of macOS, making it of zero use to myself and many others.
 

kucharsk

macrumors regular
May 31, 2016
157
96
If your current computer is 5 years older than these are and you can’t afford anything new I bet you would at least look.

If it can't run the latest version of macOS, it's of no use to me.

Five year-old machines can, but they will be slower doing so.
 

Mr_Budder

macrumors newbie
Nov 11, 2020
1
0
I don't know what's going on with Apple in Australia, but they are willing to give me £100 for my 2012 21.5" iMac and £380 for my 2016 MacBook Pro 13".
 

ght56

macrumors 6502a
Aug 31, 2020
839
815
Were trade-in values adjusted yesterday? I got $710 locked in for my 2016 rMBP (512GB SSD, 16GB RAM) right after pre-orders went live.

Did you perhaps accidentally say 'No' to the question about the enclosure being free from warping and swelling, or something?

The amount being offered is likely actively adjusted based on stock. If they get a surge of certain models, the amount they offer may decrease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UltimateSyn
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.