Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

glawrie

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 31, 2005
56
5
Maidenhead, UK
I have a moderately updated 5,1 Mac Pro - currently with a generic USB3 PCI-e card providing four additional fast USB ports.

I now need to connect a USB-C device to the machine.

I am not sure whether it is better to use a USB-A to USB-C converter plug or to add an additional (or replacement) PCI-e card with USB-C port(s).

Grateful for any suggestions / ideas etc.
 
I have a moderately updated 5,1 Mac Pro - currently with a generic USB3 PCI-e card providing four additional fast USB ports.

I now need to connect a USB-C device to the machine.

I am not sure whether it is better to use a USB-A to USB-C converter plug or to add an additional (or replacement) PCI-e card with USB-C port(s).

Grateful for any suggestions / ideas etc.

I have some experience with several of the USB PCI cards for the cMPs. If you need USB3 speeds (<500MB/s) The choices are mostly 2-port and 4-port cards. The best cards have an unshared USB port for each device. If you need the faster speeds of USB3.1gen2, you can also get those cards which are <1,000MB/s. Those are USB3.1 gen2 or newer, and they come in a variety of configurations with type A or Type C (USB-C), and port sharing except for the HiPoint unit which is best. When USB3 was fastest, I had a $60 4-port unit from Sonnet. Then I put a 4-port type-a USB 3.1 gen2 (<$100). unit in to replace it. That works well except each pair shares a port. A friend has the 4 socket HiPoint with no sharing. Both our units are typeA, to be more versatile.

So, if your USB external device is a fast device like an SSD, you can double your speeds with a 3.1gen2 card. On the other hand, if its a spinner, or almost anything else, USB3 is fine and there are adapters and adapter cables galore. BTW, specs for USB are all over the place, so run the BlackMagic Speed Test to get real world specs. Most USB3 cables are fine for USB3.1gen2. Beware of booting. No USB PCI card that I'm aware of will allow booting, so you must plug it in to the USB2 ports front or back on the chassis, which are super slow.

Some of the new, tiny portable SSD drives, like the Samsung T5 and T7 work really well for certain tasks. They don't have the SATA SSD limitations (<600MB/s) as they are NVMe based. The T5 works for USB3, but I believe the T7 gets speeds close to 800MB/s with USB3.1gen2, and newer, for just a little more $. Good luck
 
Read at least the first post of https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/usb-3-x-pcie-cards-for-classic-mac-pro.1501482/

You should avoid USB-A to USB-C converter plugs because they are not part of the USB spec. Instead, you should use a USB-C to USB-A cable. This will not help if your USB-C device does not have a removable USB-C cable.

There are approximately 3 different controller speeds you can get:
1) USB 3.0 ~400 MB/s
2) USB 3.1 gen 2 (PCIe 2.0 x2 or PCIe 3.0 x1) ~750 MB/s
3) UsB 3.1 gen 2 (PCIe 2.0 x4 or PCIe 3.0 x2) ~980 MB/s
 
I can advocate for the Sonnet Allegro cards. They work very well for that price point (70-80€). But I also got a USBC card from Nanotek for 3€ (yup) on Amazon just to have it as a spare and... it worked, at ,east for non powered USB appliances.
 
I use this in my iMac 2010. Perhaps, you may consider it in your MacPro.

It uses Fresco 1100 chipset and is natively supported in OSX. There are two Fresco chips, one controlling two USB-C and the other 3 USB-A.

Alternatively its younger sister with only one Fresco chip:
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
You should avoid USB-A to USB-C converter plugs because they are not part of the USB spec. Instead, you should use a USB-C to USB-A cable.
I have heaps of these, and they come with plenty of devices. Spec or not, they work fine. They’re far less of a mess than the actual USB spec these days.
 
I have heaps of these, and they come with plenty of devices. Spec or not, they work fine. They’re far less of a mess than the actual USB spec these days.
Like this one? https://www.amazon.ca/Satechi-Type-Type-C-Adapter-Converter/dp/B07KCL8WZK
or this one? https://www.amazon.ca/Electop-USB-3-0-Type-Converter/dp/B07B47V967

Here's a note from Benson Leung who tests many USB type devices:
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: crjackson2134
I have a moderately updated 5,1 Mac Pro - currently with a generic USB3 PCI-e card providing four additional fast USB ports.

I now need to connect a USB-C device to the machine.

I am not sure whether it is better to use a USB-A to USB-C converter plug or to add an additional (or replacement) PCI-e card with USB-C port(s).

Grateful for any suggestions / ideas etc.
I recently purchased the Inatech USB C and USB A combo card, which works flawlessly in my mac Pro 4,1 (5,1).

There is also a newer version that repositions the USB c ports and has more available power.

About $69 on Amazon and delivered the SAME DAY.

Nice upgrade.
 
I recently purchased the Inatech USB C and USB A combo card, which works flawlessly in my mac Pro 4,1 (5,1).

I’m using an inateck and it works until I plug in a bus powered SATA drive.

I have USB-C to SATA adapter. On my MacBooks it easily powers any 2.5” spinner. Never had a flaw in performance and connection and it runs at full 6G speed.

On my 5,1 it will mount but I can’t do anything with the volume in macOS. Then it will disconnect suddenly and a few seconds later reconnect so it’s useless for spinners. Solid state drives aren’t a problem.

That makes me think it’s a power issue obviously but the website says it should have 15w at the C port. If I’m reading correctly, a spinner only needs 1.7w max.

Have you tested bus powered devices?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.