No. Extra RAM and extra SSD priority. If you have extra to spend after maxing them, then consider it.Will be using it for LR and PS usage with external monitor.
Geekbench shows only minimal difference between the i5 and i7 despite the larger cache
No. Extra RAM and extra SSD priority. If you have extra to spend after maxing them, then consider it.
I hate micro-managing files. Also know that once you're at 75-80% capacity full your drive will start to slow down noticibly.Storage really isn't that important once you have 1.5x-2.0x your needs. I have 512 in my 2018 i9 with 32GB of RAM, but I also have 200GB of iCloud storage, 10 TB of external USB 3.0 hard drives, 2 TB of flash USB-C and USB 3.0 drives, and 1 TB of SD cards fit for 4K recording used for storage. The i9 was more important than another 512GB of storage.
How often will most people be accessing over 512 GB of storage at a time? That's a question for the OP in this situation, but I rarely hit half that while running macOS as a host then Win10Pro and Ubuntu as VMs with two jobs and an expansive music and picture collection.
OP, don't go insane on storage if you don't need it. The processor is a better bet if you know you're not going to use more than 512 GB of storage.
I hate micro-managing files. Also know that once you're at 75-80% capacity full your drive will start to slow down noticibly.
good choiceThanks for the feedback. Will settle for i5, 16 ram and 512 SSD
It is not that bad in geekbench: single,multi ->i5: 4490,16434 i7: 5127,17490The single threaded benchmark scores are actually pretty significant imo. 4600 vs 53-5400. I feel the multi threads have a decent difference as well. Real world? No idea lol
That's actually on the low side. There's another thread talking about performance for the 13 only. Myself and another guy consistently get 53-5400 and 18200-18300. I have never gotten close to 17.5 for multi. So now we are talking close to 2k difference in multi between the i5 and i7. Is that real world? I don't know. But that's significant as far as scores go.goo
good choice
[doublepost=1532945279][/doublepost]
It is not that bad in geekbench: single,multi ->i5: 4490,16434 i7: 5127,17490
Yea, but both are hyperthreaded, so it is not night and day. 4500 in single is pretty fast actually and over 15k in multi is insane, these CPUs are crazy! The i5 is already faster than 7gen i7s (it is equivalent to the 7920HQ)!That's actually on the low side. There's another thread talking about performance for the 13 only. Myself and another guy consistently get 53-5400 and 18200-18300. I have never gotten close to 17.5 for multi. So now we are talking close to 2k difference in multi between the i5 and i7. Is that real world? I don't know. But that's significant as far as scores go.