Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

this is funah

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 13, 2005
458
0
Berlin, Germany
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/web/03/29/amazon.cloud.mashable/

Amazon has just entered the streaming music business with the launch of Cloud Player, a music player that lets anyone upload their music to Amazon's servers and play them via the web or Android.

The new Cloud Player service adds a new "Save to Amazon Cloud Drive" button for saving MP3s to the cloud, as well as an option to upload music from a hard drive to a user's Cloud Drive.

Users are given 5 GB of free storage, but can get 20 GB if they purchase an album through Amazon. It's $1 per GB after that.

Cloud Player comes in two flavors, an app for the web and an Android app counterpart. Both players allow users to upload their music, create playlists and organize their music.

And because it's a cloud-based platform, users can access their music and settings from any compatible computer or Android device.

The most comparable service to Cloud Drive is probably Grooveshark, which also lets you upload your music, though Amazon has several major advantages in its MP3 store, its longstanding payment system and its stronger brand recognition.

Google and Apple have been rumored to be hard at work on their own cloud-based players, but it looks like Amazon beat them to the punch. Amazon's Cloud Player will certainly face a stiff challenge when they launch their own streaming music services, especially given Google's control over Android and Apple's control over iPhone and iTunes.
 
Apple didn't have the first mp3 player on the market either, and we know how the iPod turned out. Cloud-based computing has been mentioned for years. Being the first doesn't mean you are the best-implemented. Time will tell.
 
I hope the improved MobileMe adds a similar functionality. But yes, Apple are getting behind. They aren't far. A bit of maintenance on iTunes, the iTunes Store and a cloud thingy added to MobileMe and Apple will be back up to speed.
 
What I think is funny about this, is there is no mention of Microsoft at all!
MS has struggled to move off the workstation based paradigm. They're unable to put together a decent OS for tablets, so far sales of win7 phones are lack luster and they seem to be spinning their wheels on the cloud. I think Ballmer lacks the vision to move the company from reactive to proactive.


I hope the improved MobileMe adds a similar functionality. But yes, Apple are getting behind. They aren't far. A bit of maintenance on iTunes, the iTunes Store and a cloud thingy added to MobileMe and Apple will be back up to speed.
For what ever reason MobileMe is the red headed step child of apple. They always try to improve it but fail by and large. The latest attemp (going to .me) has been better then prior attempts but still, no where what the competition is offering. iDisk is pathetically slow, the web hosting is not even worth doing at this point, only offering simple static pagse. Email seems to be improving as does iCal.

I'm hoping to see some major improvements but I'm also worried they'll finally give the heave ho to all .mac email address and force those of us who still have .mac to use .me
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't you already do this by buying music off of iTunes and throwing it on your DropBox?
 
Apple didn't have the first mp3 player on the market either, and we know how the iPod turned out. Cloud-based computing has been mentioned for years. Being the first doesn't mean you are the best-implemented. Time will tell.

I love how people on a Mac Rumours forum still don't get this. Being the first doesn't mean being the best. Apple wants to be the best.
 
I'm am Amazon.com customer so I just started using the Cloud Drive. It's pretty interesting, but the Drive Manager needs a lot of work. F.e., if you want to browse to add folders it gives you the most basic browse dialog that doesn't even have any search capability. You literally have to drill down all the way. That's very BETA. I get the feeling it's very rushed right now and they simply wanted to beat everyone to market.
 
I don't really care for this, I'm not going to waste data playing music when I can have it on my iPhone already.
 
I don't really care for this, I'm not going to waste data playing music when I can have it on my iPhone already.

I completely agree. Despite the fact that Amazon automatically puts your purchased MP3's into your Cloud, until upload speeds can make it QUICK AND EASY AND CHEAP to upload 30GBs of my music, I have no interest in really using it. eg, I don't buy enough music from Amazon to justify using it - and uploading a single playlist with maybe 30 songs takes over an hour - but on any given day I'm bopping around in a 90+ song playlist or going from one playlist to another...

It's a great start, it really is, but it takes such a huge time investment to get it up to speed with my Personal Music Ecosystem it won't actually be useful. For me. In many ways, it's very similar to subscription music services, except that here, you don't have to pay for the music but for the space, and while you already have all the music - which you can upload at exorbitant cost of time - the easiest way is to buy into it by purchasing all your music from Amazon (which if you buy a lot of music online, can be great) or re-purchasing the music you otherwise would have to wait hours to upload.

...Strike Two for me is that's it's not integrated to iTunes/iPod (for me, that's a bad thing.. for others it might be a big plus). I take my iPod to work everyday and play it on my workstation through iTunes or directly through earbuds - I don't have to have any software open at all if I don't want to.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.