Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cube

Suspended
Original poster
May 10, 2004
17,011
4,973
I bought an Android 2.3 given that ICS was promised for it.

But I still haven't upgraded because, among other things, 512MiB is not ideal.

So I have decided that the next one I get should have at least 2GiB of RAM so that this doesn't happen again.

It should still come from a vendor with good Android support, of course.
 

RocketRed

macrumors 6502a
Jan 25, 2012
507
0
I don't see a question or request in your post... are you asking for recommendations of Android phones? Or are you thinking of switching to glorious iPhone-race?

On that note, you'd have better luck and responses on XDA-developers or an Android forum :rolleyes:
 

blackhand1001

macrumors 68030
Jan 6, 2009
2,600
37
I bought an Android 2.3 given that ICS was promised for it.

But I still haven't upgraded because, among other things, 512MiB is not ideal.

So I have decided that the next one I get should have at least 2GiB of RAM so that this doesn't happen again.

It should still come from a vendor with good Android support, of course.

There are plenty of phones with 512mb and ICS. The HTC one v is one.
 

cube

Suspended
Original poster
May 10, 2004
17,011
4,973
There are plenty of phones with 512mb and ICS. The HTC one v is one.

ICS was made with 1 GiB in mind. There's people complaining about RAM usage on my phone (not just about that).

I'm not talking about running a hacked version which removes bloat.
 

alphaod

macrumors Core
Feb 9, 2008
22,183
1,245
NYC
So right now your only choice is the US spec Samsung Galaxy S III?

Anyways I have a International spec S III, with only 1GB of RAM. Seems to run ICS fine.
 

xAnthony

macrumors 65816
Mar 2, 2010
1,174
143
Where's my boy Calidude !! This is an Android thread, he should be all over this one.
 

Jb07

macrumors 6502
Oct 31, 2011
433
1
Dallas
And..... What are you trying to say? A phone with 512MB of RAM can run ICS just fine. It's you carrier and phone manufacturer saying it can't and not giving your phone ICS.
 

cube

Suspended
Original poster
May 10, 2004
17,011
4,973
So right now your only choice is the US spec Samsung Galaxy S III?

Anyways I have a International spec S III, with only 1GB of RAM. Seems to run ICS fine.

I am not talking about being able to run ICS on a 1GiB RAM phone, but about buying an ICS phone that can run the next major version of Android.
 

cube

Suspended
Original poster
May 10, 2004
17,011
4,973
And..... What are you trying to say? A phone with 512MB of RAM can run ICS just fine. It's you carrier and phone manufacturer saying it can't and not giving your phone ICS.

I don't think you understand.

- My vendor promised ICS for this and other models.
- When the release approached, they warned about the performance on those phones.
- The vendor then released the update, and people who upgraded are complaining, even after a couple iterations.

The CPU seems to have quite a hard time with ICS too.

Note also that I discovered my phone has too little internal storage, because even if you try to install almost every app on the memory card, the built-in fills up quite quickly. (Note that I won't buy a phone that does not have a memory slot).

So it is clear these phones were barely specified to run what was at the time the current version.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cynics

macrumors G4
Jan 8, 2012
11,959
2,156
What phone/manufacture are you talking about? Reason I ask is cause ICS runs pretty well on the Nexus S and that has 512gb ram, the mild stuttering it has should be cleared up with Jelly Bean....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rodimus Prime

macrumors G4
Oct 9, 2006
10,136
4
So right now your only choice is the US spec Samsung Galaxy S III?

Anyways I have a International spec S III, with only 1GB of RAM. Seems to run ICS fine.

The reason that the US version has 2gigs of ram is to make up for the fact that the CPU is not as good. It has a weaker CPU because they need the quadcom LTE chip in it and quadcom LTE antenna only works with quadcom CPU's.

It is pretty well agreed apond that that quadcoms LTE chip and chip is by far the best one. Quadcom is use that to push their weaker CPU's
 

cube

Suspended
Original poster
May 10, 2004
17,011
4,973
The reason that the US version has 2gigs of ram is to make up for the fact that the CPU is not as good. It has a weaker CPU because they need the quadcom LTE chip in it and quadcom LTE antenna only works with quadcom CPU's.

It is pretty well agreed apond that that quadcoms LTE chip and chip is by far the best one. Quadcom is use that to push their weaker CPU's

What about the Japan version?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.