Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

roxxette

macrumors 68000
Aug 9, 2011
1,507
0
It was a proof of concept to show that there are massive security holes in the airline industry. Hopefully, airline security will listen. Not all hackers are evil.

Thats what is impresive, with the ****** economy whe live atm it would have been a great opportunity to make some good money :) hopefully he gets some kind of reward or they use him for future projects.
 

Markyboy81

macrumors 6502a
Oct 30, 2011
514
0
I'm surprised that you're able to do this with the autopilot, I can't see a reason why the system would allow it to be controlled remotely. Surely it should just be wired into the plane?
 

0dev

macrumors 68040
Dec 22, 2009
3,947
24
127.0.0.1
It's not really Android that can hack airplanes, it's the app the guy wrote, it was just on Android because it's a nice open platform to develop proof of concepts like this on.

Anyway, this is scary indeed. I hope this gets fixed soon, the one place you really don't want exploits is ****ing airplanes :eek:
 

0dev

macrumors 68040
Dec 22, 2009
3,947
24
127.0.0.1
This has now been dismissed:

As reported by Information Week, the FAA's said that it "is aware that a German information technology consultant has alleged he has detected a security issue with the Honeywell NZ-2000 Flight Management System (FMS) using only a desktop computer," but the hack does not "pose a flight safety concern because it does not work on certified flight hardware." Additionally, the FAA says that "the described technique cannot engage or control the aircraft's autopilot system using the FMS or prevent a pilot from overriding the autopilot," meaning that "a hacker cannot obtain 'full control of an aircraft' as the technology consultant has claimed."

That jibes with the EASA's position on the matter. "There are major differences between a PC-based training FMS software and an embedded FMS software," said the group. "In particular, the FMS simulation software does not have the same overwriting protection and redundancies that is included in the certified flight software."
 

mrsir2009

macrumors 604
Sep 17, 2009
7,505
156
Melbourne, Australia
That's quite interesting... Although I doubt it would be any good for terrorists, as the pilot would probably notice pretty quickly that the plane is going off course, so he'd just disengage the autopilot and fly manually.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.