Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Rodimus Prime

macrumors G4
Oct 9, 2006
10,136
4
not really surprised by this as I know the others on that list all do nightly builds or at least weekly.

Compared to Android which is under I believe the Aphce licences which means they only have to release the source at a later date but during the dev cycle it does not require anything.

End result is none of it is really surprising.
 

Kariya

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Nov 3, 2010
1,820
10
I've always thought Google's rhetoric of 'open' was a bit rich.
 

KnightWRX

macrumors Pentium
Jan 28, 2009
15,046
4
Quebec, Canada
Compared to Android which is under I believe the Aphce licences which means they only have to release the source at a later date but during the dev cycle it does not require anything.

The license is not what says they must release the source. It's the fact that they are the copyright owners for the code base. Even if it was under the GNU GPL, they could distribute just binaries without source and not be in violation.

The open source licenses only apply to people who are not the owners to the actual copyrights.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
I've always thought Google's rhetoric of 'open' was a bit rich.

Isn't the saying perception is 9/10s of the law :p

Clearly google is relying more on marketing/propagenda to propagate the notion that they fully embrace open source. So far that has worked pretty well for them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.