A side observation: the difference in iPhone sales between China and India is striking:
China - 2,500,000 iPhones per quarter
India - .... 50,000 iPhones per quarter
China sales are fifty times India sales, even though they both have about 1 billion cell subscribers, give or take a hundred million.
"The issue for Apple in China is that its iPhone tends to be far more expensive than many Android-based devices. In fact, as Tech In Asia points out, the iPhone's average cost is 3.25 times higher than that of the average Android smartphone."
There is your reason right there. Not to mention Android phones in these countries are usually given away free like candy when signing up for service and tons of BOGO offers.
Its because people in China know the value of a dollar.
There is your reason right there.
Not to mention Android phones in these countries are usually given away free like candy when signing up for service and tons of BOGO offers.
Honda Accords outsell the Mercedes S65 too, shocking! People like cheap. Thats why Windows sell more than Apple computers too.
Honda Accords outsell the Mercedes S65 too, shocking! People like cheap. Thats why Windows sell more than Apple computers too.
Honda Accords outsell the Mercedes S65 too, shocking! People like cheap. Thats why Windows sell more than Apple computers too.
Well the Galaxy S3 outsold the iPhone 4S and any other cheap smartphone, so your statement doesn't really hold.
Does this have anything to do with the horrible PR Apple must get in China thanks to the treatment of workers at the Foxconn factory?
Proof please.
Samsung doesn't announce numbers of phones sold to actual consumers.
----------
That's China's issue not Apple.
Samsung doesn't announce numbers of phones sold to actual consumers.
Proof please.
Samsung doesn't announce numbers of phones sold to actual consumers.
----------
That's China's issue not Apple.
OK. It outshipped the iPhone 4S.
Neither does Apple.
In neither company's case would retailers keep buying phones they're not eventually selling to end users.
We've been over this many times.
Lets try to use some logic here, if Samsung is just shipping phones and not actually selling them then why do retailers and carriers keep ordering more and Samsung posts record profits last quarter that were nearly on pair with Apples profits?
Warehouses rejoice!
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/11/05Apple-Sells-Three-Million-iPads-in-Three-Days.html
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/09/24iPhone-5-First-Weekend-Sales-Top-Five-Million.html
These aren't numbers sold to Best Buy, Carriers et al
Look at the numbers again. Samsung is not a US company so they don't have the same SEC guidelines to follow in reporting.
"The issue for Apple in China is that its iPhone tends to be far more expensive than many Android-based devices. In fact, as Tech In Asia points out, the iPhone's average cost is 3.25 times higher than that of the average Android smartphone."
There is your reason right there. Not to mention Android phones in these countries are usually given away free like candy when signing up for service and tons of BOGO offers.
Neither does Apple.
In neither company's case would retailers keep buying phones they're not eventually selling to end users.
We've been over this many times.
Take a look at Appleinsider. They seem to believe that 90% of non - iphone purchases are immediately returned or beaten with a hammer. Some might go unsold among the less popular models. Do you know if Samsung buys back unsold phones?
Take a look at Appleinsider. They seem to believe that 90% of non - iphone purchases are immediately returned or beaten with a hammer. Some might go unsold among the less popular models. Do you know if Samsung buys back unsold phones?
You could just post the link.
Sorry I meant that more in a figurative sense. I didn't mean to literally send people to another apple forum. It's just a very biased site. I find some of the comparisons between phones and other electronics to be interesting. The comment regarding shipments just reminded me of it.
Look at the numbers again. Samsung is not a US company so they don't have the same SEC guidelines to follow in reporting.
"Sales of products and merchandise are recognized upon delivery when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of goods have transferred to the buyer, continuing managerial involvement usually associated with ownership and effective control have ceased, the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the Company and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. The Company records reductions to revenue for special pricing arrangements, price protection and other volume based discounts. If product sales are subject to customer acceptance, revenue is not recognized until customer acceptance occurs." - Samsung annual report