The only ones I really disliked were Spring, and the close-up macro shots. The macro shots of "stuff" seem like test shots, as though you just learnt what "depth of field" is, and are just experimenting. If these were test shots, I wouldn't say anything, but since you actually wanted criticism on the shot, you probably were implying that they're shots you like. Personally, I don't enjoy them, but some people will enjoy any shot with a shallow depth of field, so those would seem appealing.
Also, in the last photo (on the 1st page), "Slid", the light in the girl's hair is VERY distracting. That's it.
In the photo "Golden", I would have preferred it if her face was in focus. You can choose to focus on her hair, or her face, and you chose the hair. I would have chosen the face, but that's my own preference. Her face is what's interesting to me, not her hair.
As a general thing, check your white balance. Some of the photos are well off mark in terms of WB, but that's easily fixable in any photo application. I guess there's no such thing as a "perfect" WB, as it's all down to preference. However, there is a certain range of acceptable WB, and some of the photos fall outside of that, IMO.
.
