I'm almost ready to buy my first iMac and I'm trying to figure out if its worth spending the extra money.
I've been a Windows user since I was 15'ish with Win'98, before that a novice user with the Amiga workbench and for the past year I've been using and teaching my self Linux and playing around on my dads iMac.
My main attraction to a Mac is that its based around Unix, so its reliable, secure and doesn't attract spyware and the alike. I will only use it for a Home movie editing, home financing, my large music library (iTunes), web design, emails, web surfing and the odd bit of gaming. I'm happy with the way everthing is laid out on the Mac OS and its functionabilty but I'm stuck with a choice.
This is whether or not to go for an iMac with the 2.4GHz, 20" screen and 4Gb Ram and an external HDD for my media library; this way everything is clean and tidy in two boxes...
or to go for a a Mac Pro. Although its more expensive; I like the option to upgrade as I can afford and need it... I mean, I'm not creating massive HD Movies but will buying a HD Camcorder in the next year or so, plus an SLR Camera. So do I get a two 2.8GHz quad core processor Mac Pro and two HDD's one at 320GB and another at 1TB, both intergrated and faster than an external drive on the iMac and then as time goes by upgrade the graphics card, the Ram and add more drives as I go?
But then, is it worth the extra money? Obviously, yes its going to be faster but for what I want it for, is there much point. I'm trying to be sensible though, I don't want to spend money I don't really need too. But, eventually when me and my girlfriend get a house, it will be networked with an apple TV in the living room and kitchen and then we'll both have a Mac Book each so there will be a network and if Microsoft allow for the play back of the Apple Lossless music on the xBox 360 then that will be another client streaming music.
Any help is appreciated, I'm very struck on the Mac Pro option but feel that I am buying something I don't need...
Cheers
I've been a Windows user since I was 15'ish with Win'98, before that a novice user with the Amiga workbench and for the past year I've been using and teaching my self Linux and playing around on my dads iMac.
My main attraction to a Mac is that its based around Unix, so its reliable, secure and doesn't attract spyware and the alike. I will only use it for a Home movie editing, home financing, my large music library (iTunes), web design, emails, web surfing and the odd bit of gaming. I'm happy with the way everthing is laid out on the Mac OS and its functionabilty but I'm stuck with a choice.
This is whether or not to go for an iMac with the 2.4GHz, 20" screen and 4Gb Ram and an external HDD for my media library; this way everything is clean and tidy in two boxes...
or to go for a a Mac Pro. Although its more expensive; I like the option to upgrade as I can afford and need it... I mean, I'm not creating massive HD Movies but will buying a HD Camcorder in the next year or so, plus an SLR Camera. So do I get a two 2.8GHz quad core processor Mac Pro and two HDD's one at 320GB and another at 1TB, both intergrated and faster than an external drive on the iMac and then as time goes by upgrade the graphics card, the Ram and add more drives as I go?
But then, is it worth the extra money? Obviously, yes its going to be faster but for what I want it for, is there much point. I'm trying to be sensible though, I don't want to spend money I don't really need too. But, eventually when me and my girlfriend get a house, it will be networked with an apple TV in the living room and kitchen and then we'll both have a Mac Book each so there will be a network and if Microsoft allow for the play back of the Apple Lossless music on the xBox 360 then that will be another client streaming music.
Any help is appreciated, I'm very struck on the Mac Pro option but feel that I am buying something I don't need...
Cheers