Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Gr1f

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 1, 2009
160
29
Hey folks,
I have read that the general consensus is to remove the shipped apple memory, in this case 4 x 8GB 2933 MHz DDR4 R-DIMM memory modules and replace with the new.

Is there a specific reason for this?

I've 4 new Nemix 32GB 2933MHz DDR4 R-DIMMs and apple's site https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210103 states that you can mix capacities as long as they're the same spec.

So Apple state "Install the 32GB DIMMs in the first slot of each channel pair.....

Screenshot 2021-01-21 at 12.08.18.png

Screenshot 2021-01-21 at 12.08.07.png


I have planned to get another 2x 32GB Nemix DIMMs in a few months but I'd leave the App memory in there if there is negligible performance hit vs 4 X 32GB DIMMs only.

Your insight as always very much appreciated!
 

Gr1f

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 1, 2009
160
29
The above layout I added was incorrect, sorry. It's
Screenshot 2021-01-21 at 12.55.39.png


Seems to work fine but the question still remains. Is there some sort of significant performance penalty?

Edit:
Just ran a Novabench memory test:
RAM Speed: 9059 MB/s

Cant seem to find anything to bench that against tho.
Update...
I did find a few more on Novabench
128GB RAM Speed: 9305 MB/s. (no idea on config)
96GB DDR4 RAM Speed: 17772 MB/s
384GB DDR4 R-DIMM RAM Speed: 8042 MB/s
96GB DDR4 R-DIMM RAM Speed: 8738 MB/s
48GB DDR4 RAM Speed: 17554 MB/s
128GB RAM Speed: 8635 MB/s

Seems to vary quite a bit.
 
Last edited:

DrEGPU

macrumors regular
Apr 17, 2020
192
82
I have 288GB of RAM in mine: 6x Kingston 32GB (from a PC build); 4x 32GB Nemix; and 4x Apple 8GB (that originally came with it). It works just fine in both MacOS and Windows bootcamp.
 

Gr1f

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 1, 2009
160
29
Yep, I get that it works but just wondering if there's a performance hit by mixing the sizes and if there is does it mean much in the real world.
 

codehead1

macrumors regular
Oct 31, 2011
117
98
Yep, I get that it works but just wondering if there's a performance hit by mixing the sizes and if there is does it mean much in the real world.
At a glance, I believe you have your DIMMs in the optimal configuration. And to the basic question, it's pretty simple: With six channels of which you're using four, you'll get 4/6 or 2/3, 67% memory bandwidth. The biggest thing to avoid is 2/6 utilization, at 33% usable bandwidth. 4/6 is a 100% improvement over 2/6, 6/6 is only a 50% improvement over 4/6, so you're doing OK.

Recognize that CPUs avoid going to memory when they can, so 67% memory bandwidth doesn't mean you'll get 67% performance. It's not ideal, but fine till you pick up another couple of DIMMs in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gr1f

Gr1f

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 1, 2009
160
29
At a glance, I believe you have your DIMMs in the optimal configuration. And to the basic question, it's pretty simple: With six channels of which you're using four, you'll get 4/6 or 2/3, 67% memory bandwidth. The biggest thing to avoid is 2/6 utilization, at 33% usable bandwidth. 4/6 is a 100% improvement over 2/6, 6/6 is only a 50% improvement over 4/6, so you're doing OK.

Recognize that CPUs avoid going to memory when they can, so 67% memory bandwidth doesn't mean you'll get 67% performance. It's not ideal, but fine till you pick up another couple of DIMMs in the future.
Thanks @codehead1 very helpful!
 
  • Like
Reactions: codehead1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.