There had been some threads about performance differences between the 1600XT 128 Mb VRAM vs. 256 Mb on the iMac.
Would something like OpenMark1.6 be able to measure any difference?
Out of curiosity, I ran it on my 20" iMac CD with 2G RAM, 128 Mb Vram (just some data points since the output is quite long):
hardware detected:
cpu family: 0x69353836
cpu type: 0x69353836
opengl vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
opengl renderer: ATI Radeon X1600 OpenGL Engine
opengl version: 1.5 ATI-1.4.26
test parms:
surface 1680x1050 32bpp
textures: on
lighting: on
keep in sync: off
test started
FPS 788.0 0 triangles
FPS 80.0 1107072 triangles
FPS 35.0 2765952 triangles
FPS 20.0 5018112 triangles
FPS 9.0 10839168 triangles
final score: 11063
What are others getting with either 128Mb or 256Mb?
Would something like OpenMark1.6 be able to measure any difference?
Out of curiosity, I ran it on my 20" iMac CD with 2G RAM, 128 Mb Vram (just some data points since the output is quite long):
hardware detected:
cpu family: 0x69353836
cpu type: 0x69353836
opengl vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
opengl renderer: ATI Radeon X1600 OpenGL Engine
opengl version: 1.5 ATI-1.4.26
test parms:
surface 1680x1050 32bpp
textures: on
lighting: on
keep in sync: off
test started
FPS 788.0 0 triangles
FPS 80.0 1107072 triangles
FPS 35.0 2765952 triangles
FPS 20.0 5018112 triangles
FPS 9.0 10839168 triangles
final score: 11063
What are others getting with either 128Mb or 256Mb?