Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SteveMcQ

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 5, 2005
56
0
Looking into getting a 15"PB right now w/ a 100GB HDD. Is there a more significant difference that I'm missing from going with the 5400rpm over the 7200rpm?

I'll only be doing basic Photoshop work, word-processing, so I'm not going to be very demanding of the system. I just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing out on some technical know-how in making my decision. Whether the speed increase is worthy of another $100 basically.

And for those suggesting an iBook instead given my needs, thanks, but I have my eyes on the PB. I'd prefer something as "future-proof" as possible and I just want a PB. Better to have more than you need than to be wanting what you don't have.

Thanks.

And as for the switch in memory: How much does another stick of 512MB RAM that's tested to be compatible w/ PBs run? I'd prefer to go through NewEgg and with Crucial, but I'm having problems accessing the site for some reason.
 

Lacero

macrumors 604
Jan 20, 2005
6,637
3
Heat from 7200 rpm HDs is probably the biggest issue, moreso than battery life.
 

shadowmoses

macrumors 68000
Mar 6, 2005
1,821
0
In my opinion the speed increase is not worth the extra $100, it will hardly be noticable, save the $100 and spend it on some RAM or something

shadow
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
SteveMcQ said:
I'd prefer something as "future-proof" as possible...
It might not matter, but the general consensus of what I've read is that boot and load times are noticeably faster with the 7200, but, of course, you won't have two PBs side by side to notice the relative speed of those things. But - if it were me - I'd spend the $100 on the faster drive. But only a fool would do something just because I'd do it. ;)
SteveMcQ said:
And as for the switch in memory: How much does another stick of 512MB RAM that's tested to be compatible w/ PBs run? I'd prefer to go through NewEgg and with Crucial, but I'm having problems accessing the site for some reason.
I bought my 1GB stick from OWC and was very happy with it. Looks like ~US$140 for 1GB, ~US$50 for 512MB.
 

yg17

macrumors Pentium
Aug 1, 2004
15,028
3,003
St. Louis, MO
I've got a 5400RPM hard drive in my Powerbook and it's plenty fast for me. A huge improvement over the 4200RPM in my iBook.

And I'm not sure how boot time is really effected. My PM G5 has 2 7200 RPM SATA drives, and I've been bored and raced my PowerBook and PowerMac at bootup several times, and each time, the PowerBook wins by a couple seconds ;)
 

maya

macrumors 68040
Oct 7, 2004
3,225
0
somewhere between here and there.
yg17 said:
...raced my PowerBook and PowerMac at bootup several times, and each time, the PowerBook wins by a couple seconds ;)

That doesn't sound right at all. :eek: ;) :D


The whole reason for a portable is battery life. That said I would stick with the 5400 rpm. If performance is what you are looking for then 7200 rpm is the way to go. You call really.


Formatting my 5400 rpm drive now, oh so slow. ;) :(
 

maya

macrumors 68040
Oct 7, 2004
3,225
0
somewhere between here and there.
Danksi said:
If you have lots of RAM, doesn't that reduce the usage of the hard-drive, generally speeding things up?

depends what program stores data on ram, such as photoshop, safari, quicktime, etc... They store temp data on ram, and the more you have the better, if not no biggy it accesses the HD. :)
 

tsk

macrumors 6502a
Jan 14, 2004
642
0
Wisconsin
Lacero said:
Heat from 7200 rpm HDs is probably the biggest issue, moreso than battery life.

The two quantities basically go hand in hand. If the HD uses more battery, it's going to generate more heat.

That said, I have yet to see any strong evidence that the 7200 RPM drives use more battery or generate more heat. In general the 7200 RPM are the latest and greatest technology so they should have very good power consumption.

A 7200 RPM drive should give you a performance boost over 5400 RPM. However, the performance gap between 4200 RPM and 5400 RPM is much bigger. So you are paying a premium for the 7200 RPM. It's all a question of how much you value the extra boost you'll see.
 

Chrispy

macrumors 68020
Dec 27, 2004
2,270
524
Indiana
There will not be much of a difference between the two drives unless you are using heavy duty video editing or photo apps without an external hard drive. In my opinion, your money would be better spent on a nice external firewire 800 hard drive.
 

alexeismertin

macrumors regular
Jun 2, 2005
240
0
Bristol, UK
go with the 7200rpm option.

The biggest difference I noticed when messing about with a Mac Mini was adding a 7200rpm drive. I also overclocked the 1.25 to a 1.5 & then added 1GB ram but the drive was the best/easiest performance booster.

The cost of the 7200rpm is well worth the extra money in terms of the performance gain, the hypothetical issue of heat doesn't stack up - why would Apple offer it if its specs didn't allow it to be installed a PB. I never encountered any heat issues installing 7200rpm drive in a mini.

The relative gains being quoted here from a 4200rpm vs 5400rpm vs 7200rpm are also rubbish - with a 7200rpm drive you WILL notice the substantial difference.

Get the drive now & you can always add 3rd party Ram later.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.