Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ZballZ

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 11, 2006
246
0
Does anyone know if it is worth upgrading the canon 400D (Xti Rebel) to the new 450D.

All I can find is SPOT-Metering, which is new, and of course 12mp instead of 10...

worth an upgrade?
 

Phrasikleia

macrumors 601
Feb 24, 2008
4,082
403
Over there------->
Live View
Larger viewfinder
Larger LCD screen (3 inches)
Spot metering
Improved 9-point AF system
14-bit A/D converter
New processor: Digic III
Faster burst mode (now 3.5fps)
Higher resolution (12.2 MP, and with remarkably low noise)
Addition of dedicated ISO button
ISO now displayed in the viewfinder
Multi-shot self-timer mode
Customizable menus
New menu system with tabs (no more scrolling)
New option for Highlight Tone Priority
New battery that lasts 50% longer
Slightly larger, but also lighter body
Slightly improved battery grip
Uses SD cards
New and improved kit lens with better optics and image stabilization
Playback as 4 and 9 image index
 

OreoCookie

macrumors 68030
Apr 14, 2001
2,727
90
Sendai, Japan
I think the most important feature is the larger viewfinder. It was the biggest feature the 400D was missing compared to the D80 (although AFAIK it's still smaller).
 

marioman38

macrumors 6502a
Aug 8, 2006
899
84
Long Beach, CA
worth an upgrade?

From the XTi to the XSi, probably not. From the XTi to the 40D, yes. The XSi has a few significant upgrades, but its really not a whole lot different from the XTi. If you had an XT, then it'd be time to cough up some $$. Either wait for the next, next-gen consumer dSLR, or if you're ready, make the jump to the EOS 40D while Canon is still offering $200 off, plus an extra $50 off that since you own an XTi. CanonEos.com and Here
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,870
902
Location Location Location
I don't even know why the 400D was released. It wasn't much better than the 350D, if at all. The 450D was a better camera, if not because of the addition of spot metering (why was the most basic form of metering ever absent?), and a larger viewfinder. This only happened due to the new competition from Nikon, which wasn't an issue during the days of the 350D. There was no need for Canon to offer any real improvements to the 350D, so when "developing" the 400D, they didn't really give people more. In hindsight, it was a mistake, and the 400D was the product of Canon's mistake.

Get a 450D.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.