johnnyjibbs said:However, don't forget that the iApps are generally targeted at consumers, not pros, and these are people who are likely to have iBooks and eMacs and Mac minis, all of which don't support Core Image.
I understand what you are saying, but I was just speculating that the act of updating some of the effects to rely heavily on Core Image could potentially cripple the performance of effects that ran well before on non-Core Image Macs and thus be a disadvantage of upgrading. I know these people don't need to upgrade but then they wouldn't get the advantage of the new features that will inevitably also be part of iLife '06. I would say that over 50% of the current user base of iLife will be running a non-Core Image Mac and, with current iBooks still not supporting it, I don't think this will change considerably in the future. Not everyone can afford the new iMac.Applespider said:They do support Core Image - just not in real-time like the more powerful graphics cards. You can run FunHouse on a non-CI Mac and you'll still get the effects, they'll just be slower to appear - they have to wait for the CPU to render it rather than the graphics card.
The video version of Funhouse that they showed at the first Tiger WWDC was amazing - put some of those filters into iMovie and people will have a blast. New Macs will support it, Apple aren't going to not give those features to people just for the sake of folks with older Macs not being able to use them. They may limit them as they do with some of the current ones - so Macs that can't handle it don't get some of the effects as they don't in the current iMovie or Keynote IIRC
johnnyjibbs said:So they must be careful not to allow performance to crawl for these machines when updating.
JasonGough said:whats Apples policy on updating iLife for people who just bought the latest revisions of Macs that came out last month?
Will they give us a nice friendly free upgrade to iLife 06, or will everyone have to buy the new version regardless?