Not really. I know what I'd use it for. Where I'd use it for and how much money I'm willing to give Tim.
What I just disagree is that the models' memory & storage should be 2x what it is for the money being asked.
Like say the $6999 2023 Mac Pro M2 Ultra. For the money being asked it should be 128GB memory & 2TB storage
$599 2023 Mac mini M2 should be 16GB memory and 512GB storage.
The Mac chips are perfect as is.
I dont mind 2x PC parts from NewEgg or Amazon. Anything more is excessively greedy.It'd hurt less if the upgrades were cheaper. $100 to double storage and memory would almost be tolerable. $200 hurts.
Not really. I know what I'd use it for. Where I'd use it for and how much money I'm willing to give Tim.
What I just disagree is that the models' memory & storage should be 2x what it is for the money being asked.
Like say the $6999 2023 Mac Pro M2 Ultra. For the money being asked it should be 128GB memory & 2TB storage
$599 2023 Mac mini M2 should be 16GB memory and 512GB storage.
The Mac chips are perfect as is.
False, the M1/8GB/256GB is actually awesome.Yes, base models may not be very useful.
It's called upselling and you shouldn't fall for it. Always buy the minimum configuration you can get away with.Upgrading the base Mini M2 to 16-512 makes one wants to pay a bit more to get M2 Pro Mini. Then, paying a bit more moves to the Studio territory.
That's why we have the Buyer's Guide. But one can always look into the second-hand market and find an offer which reflects the true value of slightly older hardware.Whatever we buy now, in 6 months or so M3 Mini and MBP M3 Pro 16" come out which can beat M2 Max Studio in some areas.
I wouldn't worry about that. There are always people who find software bugs and report wireless connection issues. These problems aren't real until you yourself run into them. WiFi could be super stable in all the locations you're going to use it. I regularly switch WiFi off and on again to reinitiate a connection. I'm not even thinking about it as a problem.Not very happy to give Apple money especially these Mac cannot even remember multi-display settings. Some even have wifi and bluetooth issues.
I don't think there is any trap that isn't simply part of any product you buy (just think of buying a car).Yes, base models may not be very useful. Upgrading the base Mini M2 to 16-512 makes one wants to pay a bit more to get M2 Pro Mini. Then, paying a bit more moves to the Studio territory. Similarly, for 15" Macbook Air, base model is not that useful and upgrading to 16-512 moves to MBP territory. Knowing that people would upgrade the ram more than ssd, Apple made the cheapest two configurations of these models 8GB only. Whatever we buy now, in 6 months or so M3 Mini and MBP M3 Pro 16" come out which can beat M2 Max Studio in some areas. The bad thing is evil Tim is selling M2 series base models with slower SSD on purpose. Not very happy to give Apple money especially these Mac cannot even remember multi-display settings. Some even have wifi and bluetooth issues.
The base model will be more than adequate for 80% or more of users.Yes, base models may not be very useful. Upgrading the base Mini M2 to 16-512 makes one wants to pay a bit more to get M2 Pro Mini. Then, paying a bit more moves to the Studio territory. Similarly, for 15" Macbook Air, base model is not that useful and upgrading to 16-512 moves to MBP territory. Knowing that people would upgrade the ram more than ssd, Apple made the cheapest two configurations of these models 8GB only. Whatever we buy now, in 6 months or so M3 Mini and MBP M3 Pro 16" come out which can beat M2 Max Studio in some areas. The bad thing is evil Tim is selling M2 series base models with slower SSD on purpose. Not very happy to give Apple money especially these Mac cannot even remember multi-display settings. Some even have wifi and bluetooth issues.
What I am not understanding is that you say that you don't want to spend more than you need but in your initial post you say that you want to spend a little more to get a little more?! Why not get a basic mac for the needs you have?For the past 10+ years I use MacBook Pro 15-16" with 16GB-1TB. However, given that I cannot run Windows natively on Silicon Mac and I work at home these days, I don't want to spend more than I need to on a Mac system.
What I am not understanding is that you say that you don't want to spend more than you need but in your initial post you say that you want to spend a little more to get a little more?! Why not get a basic mac for the needs you have?
Why not buy the base model then return if you changed your mind, again?I keep changing my mind many times each day. Getting a basic mac for the needs I have is probably a good idea.
Give a $1299 iMac M1 + $119.99 external 2TB SSD a try. It will be faster than any MBP you've owned in 10+ years.For the past 10+ years I use MacBook Pro 15-16" with 16GB-1TB. However, given that I cannot run Windows natively on Silicon Mac and I work at home these days, I don't want to spend more than I need to on a Mac system.
You're falling into the tech nerd, listening to the forums trap.Yes, base models may not be very useful. Upgrading the base Mini M2 to 16-512 makes one wants to pay a bit more to get M2 Pro Mini. Then, paying a bit more moves to the Studio territory. Similarly, for 15" Macbook Air, base model is not that useful and upgrading to 16-512 moves to MBP territory. Knowing that people would upgrade the ram more than ssd, Apple made the cheapest two configurations of these models 8GB only. Whatever we buy now, in 6 months or so M3 Mini and MBP M3 Pro 16" come out which can beat M2 Max Studio in some areas. The bad thing is evil Tim is selling M2 series base models with slower SSD on purpose. Not very happy to give Apple money especially these Mac cannot even remember multi-display settings. Some even have wifi and bluetooth issues.
Since the Silicon Mac, I have a big headache in choosing Apple products. Any model, any configuration is like a trap.
Why was it awful?It was worse a few years ago. In summer 2018 for a desktop Mac this is what you were choosing from:
Literally 3 different vintages, and some coming with slow hard drives. It was awful.
- 2013 – Mac Pro
- 2014 – Mac mini
- 2017 – iMac 21.5"
- 2017 – iMac 21.5" 4K
- 2017 – iMac 27" 5K
- 2017 – iMac Pro
You decide you can only afford the least expensive Mac, the Mac mini, and you're getting a computer from 2014. Let me remind you, it's currently 2018. That's a 4-year-old computer.Why was it awful?
You choose what you want/need, and then, you decide whether you can afford this purchase.
Or, initially, you decide what you can afford to pay, and, your choice of computer (and specs) will be determined by that.
If Apple did not offer a choice of products, I am willing to wager that the howls of protest would sound even louder.
This is a valid perspective. Ranting on a forum dedicated to Apple products is one thing but nothing can compare to the pain of losing someone close to you. I'm sorry for your loss.I have worked in war-zones. That is "awful". I have lived in worlds where colleagues of mine were killed. That, too, is beyond awful.
However, "Awful" is not the word I would choose if offered a selection from which to choose something to buy.
I have no problem deciding which Mac or iPhone I want or need, but iPad is another issue. Too many options that are drastically different in specs yet too similar in size. I feel like they need to keep it to 3 sizes, and they all need to get on the same page as far as the processor and screen type.Since the Silicon Mac, I have a big headache in choosing Apple products. Any model, any configuration is like a trap.
I find the offerings to be much more simple after the transition... (someone did a good breakdown above)... It comes down to:Since the Silicon Mac, I have a big headache in choosing Apple products. Any model, any configuration is like a trap.