Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

punitnaker

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 29, 2008
120
43
Wasn't that kinda the point. A large iPod Touch gives you all the things that made iPhone OS so great but gives it to you on a screen that you can actually use.

I find myself in limbo.

The iPhone has meant that I use the internet more than ever, everywhere.

When I'm at home though, I find that I can't be bothered to use the iPhone because its still kinda slow and the screen is too small. And sitting there for long periods of time with the MBP on my lap is kinda annoying.

My MPB needs an upgrade as its the first one that came out. I'm now thinking iPad + iMac will be a more effective buy and suit my needs better. :)
 

jacinto45

macrumors member
Jul 16, 2002
51
0
What I'm wondering is what all of the "big iPod touch" complainers thought that an Apple tablet computer would look like that would be so different, physically, than a large iPod touch.
 

Chaos123x

macrumors 68000
Jul 8, 2008
1,698
34
They were expecting a paradigm shift in computing. A fully functional touch OS just as powerful as Snow Leopard with a powerful computer to back it up.

What we got is pretty much a cheap toy for grandma to use.

basically we wanted to the PS3 and we got the Wii.


But I bet casual people will love it, as long as apple can figure out a way so you don't need to ever sync with itunes or another computer.
 

Chaos123x

macrumors 68000
Jul 8, 2008
1,698
34
Apparently a Mac Pro is just a big Mac Mini.

Pretty much. The Mac Pro might be faster and be more expandable but it's pretty much the same thing. I run Final Cut Studio on a octo-core Mac Pro and my best friend does it on a g4 mac mini. Sure one is faster then the other but it's pretty much the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.