Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

snarestud940

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 3, 2012
517
28
has anyone updated their late 2008 aluminum macbook to yosemite? I find mine to very very slow?
 

Primejimbo

macrumors 68040
Aug 10, 2008
3,295
131
Around
I did this only because I wanted to learn about it. I have a iPad Air and a Mac Mini (media stuff, iTunes, music, movies, and photos) so my Macbook got used once i a great while. When I did use it, it got slow, errors, and I hated to use it.

I was only running Snow Leopard and never thought I would ever update it because I don't have a need for it. I decided to have some fun with Yosemite and do a fresh install on my Aluminum Macbook so I can learn about it to help others. I am amazed how good it's running. It's not fast, BUT a lot better than it has been for the last year, year and a half. If I put 4 GB of RAM, I bet it would run a lot better.

I am having a lot of fun with this Macbook again, but all I am doing is web browsing.
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,380
3,415
I am currently using a 2008 aluminium MacBook and running Yosemite just fine. I would say the performance is comparable to Mavericks. I can’t say that it’s faster or slower, it’s mostly the same for me.

However, I do need to point out that I’m using the 2.4 version and I switched to an SSD and upgraded my RAM to 8 GB a couple of years ago. That contributes a lot to the performance. In sum, if you’re using Mavericks or any of the later operating systems and you’re satisfied with the performance, then Yosemite will be fine too. If you’re still on Leopard or Snow Leopard however, then I can guarantee that the system will be a lot slower.
 

nebo1ss

macrumors 68030
Jun 2, 2010
2,909
1,709
I am currently using a 2008 aluminium MacBook and running Yosemite just fine. I would say the performance is comparable to Mavericks. I can’t say that it’s faster or slower, it’s mostly the same for me.

However, I do need to point out that I’m using the 2.4 version and I switched to an SSD and upgraded my RAM to 8 GB a couple of years ago. That contributes a lot to the performance. In sum, if you’re using Mavericks or any of the later operating systems and you’re satisfied with the performance, then Yosemite will be fine too.

Agreed, I upgraded memory and disk drive to an SSD after lousy performance on Maverick. However, the upgrade to Yosemite has been painless and if anything running better than Mavericks. I am also running the 2.4 Core 2 Duo
Late 2008 macbook Pro
 

Primejimbo

macrumors 68040
Aug 10, 2008
3,295
131
Around
I am currently using a 2008 aluminium MacBook and running Yosemite just fine. I would say the performance is comparable to Mavericks. I can’t say that it’s faster or slower, it’s mostly the same for me.

However, I do need to point out that I’m using the 2.4 version and I switched to an SSD and upgraded my RAM to 8 GB a couple of years ago. That contributes a lot to the performance. In sum, if you’re using Mavericks or any of the later operating systems and you’re satisfied with the performance, then Yosemite will be fine too.

I am running a stock 2.4. I have heard that I can upgrade to 8GB or RAM, but i am hearing mix info that the max was 4.
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,380
3,415
I am running a stock 2.4. I have heard that I can upgrade to 8GB or RAM, but i am hearing mix info that the max was 4.

I vaguely remember that at some point, the OS supported it. But don’t quote me on that. I’ve upgraded the RAM in Mountain Lion I think, perhaps even earlier. No problems here.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-19 at 19.57.59.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-19 at 19.57.59.png
    82.8 KB · Views: 206

Primejimbo

macrumors 68040
Aug 10, 2008
3,295
131
Around
I vaguely remember that at some point, the OS supported it. But don’t quote me on that. I’ve upgraded the RAM in Mountain Lion I think, perhaps even earlier. No problems here.

I'm not doubting you at all, and I wish I did it when RAM was cheaper a few years ago. I upgraded my Mac Mini to 8GB for $45, and now its $45 for 4GB.

I read it was some firmware update or something too. Maybe I'll upgrade this old thing because I don't need a new Macbook since my Mac Mini and iPad does all I need.

Thanks for the info! Nice to see someone who actually did this and no issues at all. What brand did you go with?
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,380
3,415
What brand did you go with?

I went with these after reading several reviews across the web. They weren’t the cheapest available, but I don’t think I found a negative review about those. I upgraded while using Lion, not Mountain Lion. So it must have been a change brought in Lion at the time that triggered my purchase (I knew that 4 GB was the maximum before).
 

RobT

macrumors 6502a
Dec 20, 2007
679
163
Ohio, USA
Same as above. Late '08 15.4" MBP with RAM upgraded to 8GB and SSD. No major performance issues for me running Yosemite (no worse than Mavericks, anyway)
 

snarestud940

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 3, 2012
517
28
I vaguely remember that at some point, the OS supported it. But don’t quote me on that. I’ve upgraded the RAM in Mountain Lion I think, perhaps even earlier. No problems here.

I only have two gigs of ram stock. Should I upgrade to 8 if possible?
 

Chundles

macrumors G5
Jul 4, 2005
12,037
493
Upgraded from Mavericks on my 2.4GHz Aluminium MacBook with 8GB RAM.

It runs so much faster than Mavericks it's not funny. Scrolling through long websites is smooth as silk, animations are stutter-free. Everything it better.
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,380
3,415
I only have two gigs of ram stock. Should I upgrade to 8 if possible?

I cannot really say. I bought my MacBook with 4 GB of RAM already and I thought it had become too slow with Lion (e.g. big apps taking forever to launch, slow multitasking and app-switching, etc.). It might be that Mavericks and Yosemite are less resource-intensive in that respect or that your needs aren’t the same as mine, so 4 GB might suffice.

Which OS are you currently running?
 

snarestud940

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 3, 2012
517
28
I cannot really say. I bought my MacBook with 4 GB of RAM already and I thought it had become too slow with Lion (e.g. big apps taking forever to launch, slow multitasking and app-switching, etc.). It might be that Mavericks and Yosemite are less resource-intensive in that respect or that your needs aren’t the same as mine, so 4 GB might suffice.

Which OS are you currently running?

Yosemite. Opening up safari takes a good 45 seconds. Or even the AppStore.
 

conifer

macrumors regular
Oct 30, 2014
154
37
Updated on 2GHz macbook aluminum late 2008 with 8GB ram and terabyte hard drive (7200 rpm).

Performance was unbearably laggy, especially in mail app would lurch from email to email. Without doing much, noticed swap would be up to 10GB easily.

After two days, went back to Mavericks, silky smooth, way better than mountain lion or yosemite. Swap in Mavericks is at zero unless doing intensive processes.

Honestly, Yosemite seemed ugly to me, I wanted to change the font, the dock, and especially the silly finder icon with the plastic looking smiles. I liked the way messages popped up and I liked the weather icon showing up in notifications.
I don't know how i would feel about the macbook ringing with phone calls. I get pocket dialed sometimes and its bad enough when FaceTime rings the phone, the iPad and the macbook rings too on delayed lag--if that happened with regular calls, it might be too much.

Some of the reviews note the UI inconsistency and suggest the later revisions to Yosemite might improve. I see how Apple is slowly inching the OSX to be more visually like the miles more popular iPhone OS and more interactive with their mobile ecosystem without giving the mac user too much culture shock. Still I'm hoping they dial the visuals back in the next round while bringing over some of the Mavericks brilliant use of RAM.

ps Also I'm tired of the tracking. I saw that I could disable in spotlight some of the info being sent to Bing and Apple. Still its tiresome always being on the defensive. Separately hearing that the mobile carriers are tracking us like crazy is another blow--I hope they get challenged to the hilt. Its enough already.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.