Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Chupa Chupa

macrumors G5
Original poster
Jul 16, 2002
14,835
7,396
Just wondering if there is a speed penalty if I used a FW800 enclosure. I'd prefer to use only ext. drives b/c the internal is so tricky to replace.
 
I've setup external HD's on iMacs where the logic board sata connection got fried. FW800 will definitely be usable, but not as pure as straight SATA. I am not sure if your imac has SATA2 interface, but let's use that as an estimate. FW800 has a transfer speed of ~100 MB/sec. SATA2 has a transfer speed of 300 MB/Sec.
 
Are you really contemplating not using the internal drive at all? That doesn't make sense - you're throwing away performance just in case it fails. Better to buy a FW800 external (or Thunderbolt external when available), use Super Duper to clone the internal to the external on a regular basis (like daily), and switch to the external IF the internal fails.

I boot my 2009 i7 iMac from a FW800 SSD, and it works great, but I would not recommend running any machine from a platter-based hard drive over FW800 unless the internal has failed.
 
I use to run two or three different installs, two on externals over FW. They were really, really old backup, but convenient when I needed to access old files or a particular *AMP stack for development, etc. Heck, I've worked for weeks on an external.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.