I believe (but could be wrong) that Aperture's changes to JPEG files are, like its modifications to RAW files, non-destructive and completely reversible. (Please someone correct me if this isn't the case).
However with a JPEG as your source file, you have no extra, invisible data that a RAW file contains, to allow you to e.g. pull detail out of shadows or into highlights. You're also dealing with a somewhat-compressed file, which if/when you subsequently re-export for printing/the web/whatever, will suffer further compression artefacts (probably not going to be visible, but might be, depending on how hard you look and what adjustments you've done).
If your camera only shoots JPEG, and you've not come across any of these issues as a problem in your work, there's not really any need to go and get a camera that can shoot RAW; it's not going to give you a dozen new editing options or anything like that.