Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Aperture support not dead ...

A

Alexander.Of.Oz

macrumors 68040
Oct 29, 2013
3,200
12,501
I would have thought that to be a prerequisite to actually using Aperture, that you had to format the referenced drive you were going to store your images on to a Mac OS format.
 
dwig

dwig

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2015
908
449
Key West FL
It is not surprising that Aperture requires an MacOS formatted drive. This seemingly new post may be the result of people working with betas of High Sierra and its new drive format and encountering issues.

On the other hand, it is interesting that the "Rip van Winkle" that wrote the notice is so far out of date concerning Windows drive formats and what is commonly sold today. FAT32 hasn't been a commonly used format on Windows since before Windows XP and external hard drives haven't commonly been sold using that format for quite a number of years. NTFS is the common Windows format and the common format for non-Mac specific external drives. These days, FAT32 is only common on USB flash drives and the smaller memory cards. On larger flash drives and memory cards ExFAT is the common format since FAT32 comes to grief with large volumes. The SD/XC memory card spec specifies ExFAT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darmok N Jalad and Alexander.Of.Oz
A

Alexander.Of.Oz

macrumors 68040
Oct 29, 2013
3,200
12,501
dwig said:
It is not surprising that Aperture requires an MacOS formatted drive. This seemingly new post may be the result of people working with betas of High Sierra and its new drive format and encountering issues.

On the other hand, it is interesting that the "Rip van Winkle" that wrote the notice is so far out of date concerning Windows drive formats and what is commonly sold today. FAT32 hasn't been a commonly used format on Windows since before Windows XP and external hard drives haven't commonly been sold using that format for quite a number of years. NTFS is the common Windows format and the common format for non-Mac specific external drives. These days, FAT32 is only common on USB flash drives and the smaller memory cards. On larger flash drives and memory cards ExFAT is the common format since FAT32 comes to grief with large volumes. The SD/XC memory card spec specifies ExFAT.
Click to expand...
I just discovered this about FAT32 when I formatted a USB stick to that and tried printing some images at a photo-kiosk on Friday for somebody! I had to come home and reformat it with ExFAT as the kiosk refused to see it.
 
MCAsan

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
As of beta 7 APFS works just fine on High Sierra. I suppose the key question is if Aperture can run on top of APFS.
 
A

ApfelKuchen

macrumors 601
Aug 28, 2012
4,335
3,012
Between the coasts
CmdrLaForge said:
The only question that this implies but doesn't answer if the new Apple File System in High Sierra works or not!
Click to expand...

There's nothing to be implied. Support articles normally don't refer to an OS in beta. No doubt this article will be updated after the release of High Sierra.

However, I am running High Sierra and APFS on my internal drive, and Aperture seems to be working just fine. I haven't pounded on every key and feature, so it's not a comprehensive assessment.
 
RednBlue

RednBlue

macrumors regular
Dec 17, 2013
209
81
Reading UK
#125
I'd love to go back to Aperture, but would it be able to read my Photos library or would I need to do some conversion that might possibly damage / lose some or all of my images?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexH
MCAsan

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
But wasn't that addressed by Apple years ago? The closest thing from them is Photos with extensions.
 
R2FX

R2FX

macrumors regular
Mar 25, 2010
236
399
They will have to pry Aperture from my cold, dead fingers..... I use Capture One 10 for editing, but all processed JPGs are stored as referenced files using Aperture. It's flabbergasting that since it was discontinued there's still no other native Mac DAM app that has feature set and speed of Aperture.

Worst decision of Tim Cook to abandon this segment and torture us with unfinished Photos app
 
  • Like
Reactions: martyjmclean, -hh, AlexH and 1 other person
Darmok N Jalad

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,433
48,476
Tanagra (not really)
Semi-related, I’m a bit surprised that “Photos” exists on both MacOS and iOS, but they don’t have the same feature set on large screen devices. I have an iPad Pro, and it’s just not much for a photo editor when compared to the MacOS version or third-party editors. It’s not that the iPad Pro is underpowered. I edit RAW files using Affinity all the time. The power is there, they need to leverage it better, especially if legacy programs like Aperture aren’t being advanced.
 
S

steve123

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Aug 26, 2007
1,156
721
R2FX said:
They will have to pry Aperture from my cold, dead fingers..... I use Capture One 10 for editing, but all processed JPGs are stored as referenced files using Aperture. It's flabbergasting that since it was discontinued there's still no other native Mac DAM app that has feature set and speed of Aperture.

Worst decision of Tim Cook to abandon this segment and torture us with unfinished Photos app
Click to expand...

Well said!
[doublepost=1538107345][/doublepost]We have been promised DAMs yet no one has delivered. A very sad state of affairs. I wish Apple would spin it off to a separate company and let someone else run with it.
[doublepost=1538107440][/doublepost]On a side note, it is interesting that Apple has not killed Aperture entirely ... it still runs in Mohave!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtbdudex and AlexH
J

jerwin

Suspended
Jun 13, 2015
2,895
4,652
arghh

ran into this error

"Aperture cannot access this library: to user this library. make sure its file permissions are set correctly."

first option: repair permissions
Consistency check completed. opening library

"Aperture cannot access this library: to use this library. make sure its file permissions are set correctly."


second option:

repair database
"Unable to write to Library Aperture Library: Check that you have permisison to write to the library directory...


My 400 gigabyte aperture library is stored on an external drive.
 
J

jerwin

Suspended
Jun 13, 2015
2,895
4,652
yeah, that's a reassuring sign. :eek:

But when I rebooted this morning, I had Aperture repair permissions again. This time it succeeded. I can see my pictures again.
 
D

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
jerwin said:
But when I rebooted this morning, I had Aperture repair permissions again. This time it succeeded. I can see my pictures again.
Click to expand...

Now would be the time to re-validate your backup strategy -- ensure it's working properly so you're not screwed if/when that external drive dies.
 
mtbdudex

mtbdudex

macrumors 68030
Aug 28, 2007
2,904
5,317
SE Michigan
steve123 said:
Well said!
[doublepost=1538107345][/doublepost]We have been promised DAMs yet no one has delivered. A very sad state of affairs. I wish Apple would spin it off to a separate company and let someone else run with it.
[doublepost=1538107440][/doublepost]On a side note, it is interesting that Apple has not killed Aperture entirely ... it still runs in Mohave!
Click to expand...

Yes - you've confirmed for me that Aperture is good on macOS Mojave (10.14), thx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom