Ok, I am finally thinking seriously about taking the plunge from Aperture 3.6 to Photos, but would love to hear from others that have made the transition with large libraries. I have researched the forum and other sites, but I still have a few lingering questions.
I am really bummed that Apple is no longer supporting Aperture. I understand their desire to move everyone to photos, but I think more should have been done to advance both products and continue to support Aperture, until Photos caught up to the pro-am market. With the improvements coming to Photos in the fall and the lack of native support for advanced iPhone photo features (live photos, slo mo, etc) I think MY best option is to make the move.
Here is what I've got in Aperture:
Has anyone else done a recent large library import into Photos? Here are a few other questions I am pondering, before doing the migration:
-Mike
I am really bummed that Apple is no longer supporting Aperture. I understand their desire to move everyone to photos, but I think more should have been done to advance both products and continue to support Aperture, until Photos caught up to the pro-am market. With the improvements coming to Photos in the fall and the lack of native support for advanced iPhone photo features (live photos, slo mo, etc) I think MY best option is to make the move.
Here is what I've got in Aperture:
- 188K photos and videos with 1.1T of data (library and file system)
- All the photo masters and video are stored/managed outside the Aperture library in a separate local file structure
- Mix of formats - RAW, simple JPG, Live photos, video is all over the map: AVI, MPG, MOV, etc.
- Digital photos dating to 1999 and ~10,000 scanned photos
- Heavy use of Aperture photo editing and versions, but very little star ratings or added metadata
- Heavy use of folder structure for project storage. ~2500 folders/projects with nesting about 5 levels deep
- I do NOT want to use iCloud to store my photos. I am happy managing them on a local disk and backing up myself. 1.1T is way to much to manage in the cloud.
Has anyone else done a recent large library import into Photos? Here are a few other questions I am pondering, before doing the migration:
- Should I delete all the thumbs, teenies, etc. from the Aperture library and then do a full rebuild first?
- My scanned photos do not have (accurate) create dates. Should I change the dates on those, as best possible, in Aperture before migrating?
- Since my masters are not stored in the Aperture library is there a way to do the migration and have photos rebuild everything (all the thumbnails), so I can dump the Aperture library (eventually)? My understanding is that Photos will use all the thumbs and edits in the Aperture library, so the Aperture library becomes frozen in time and has to stay around.
- Aperture is really bad with video files. I have a lot of video in Aperture that will only render if launched via Quicktime. I did a test with Photos and it imported 9 out of 10 of my formats. Anything special I should do with video?
- About half of my files are not geotagged. I would eventually like to geotag most of them. Photos now allows for geotagging, so my plan is to do it in Photos later. Any advantage to doing it in Aperture, before the move? Photos seems easy to batch geotag.
-Mike