Apple Intelligence? Other artificial intelligence services? Or do you avoid all that?

[crococarbs]

Is Apple Intelligence yay or nay? How about the others?

 

[I7guy]

I use AI for some big analysis that a phone isn’t suitable for. My use cases on the phone are different than these big analysis. I would like Siri to be better, but I’m not really able to speak to Siri most of my day. So I would have to use type to Siri. I do like the summaries of my messages and emails.

 

[JSRinUK]

I mostly use local LLMs to help brainstorming the story I’m writing. I primarily use local ones because online ones tend to be more censored/biased, which is no friend to creativity.

I have, from time to time, used ChatGPT, Grok, and DuckDuckGo’s implementation, but this is primarily for general purpose stuff. If I don’t need latest information, I stay away from them.

I’ve tried using Apple’s “Writing Tools” to summarise scenes from my story, but it doesn’t like to do it...

… making it all but useless for my purposes. Other LLMs are perfectly happy to do it. I find Apple’s approach too restrictive.

 

[IowaLynn]

When I do, it is research. Bought subscription for Perplexity but switched to ChatGPT

And just one a day or less, but it is conversational. Better question yields good in-depth answers. Can chat for 30 minutes on a topic.

 

[mariuskv]

Played around with apple intelligence for 5min then turned it off

 

[User #07242024]

You.com, Duck.ai and Venice.ai.

 

[crococarbs]

Played around with apple intelligence for 5min then turned it off

Pretty much my same experience with Apple Intelligence, also with ChatGPT I asked a few questions and so many inaccuracies and some plain wrong facts, I maybe lasted like 10mins with that and also thought it was useless and gave up.

My peers tell me that coding assistant AIs do help so dunno *shrugs*.

 

[almostinsane]

I used none and have AI disabled on my iPad and iPhone.

 

[Mousse]

Can AI go through lines of code and output in plain language what each function does? I imagine it would make debugging a lot easier. Heck, I would be able to debug if what I'm reading suddenly makes me feel dyslexic.

Programming is basically writing so that a machine can understand it. AI would basically translate code into a language regular folks can understand, ie automatically add comments to code. If the code has errors, it would easier to spot.

 

[Bungaree.Chubbins]

I routinely use Apple Intelligence for proofreading. I find it very useful. I mucked around with other AI for a while to learn what the hype is all about, but image generation is entirely useless for me, and ChatGPT, Claude, Gemma, Llama, etc., are wrong so often that they're worse than useless. Using them increases the amount of time it takes to do anything because you have to go and double-check all the output!

 

[JSRinUK]

Can AI go through lines of code and output in plain language what each function does? I imagine it would make debugging a lot easier.

I’ve done this in a small way recently.

There was a small script I found on the ‘net I wanted to try out but, just to be safe, I threw it at Grok and it came back with a line-by-line account of what it does.

For my own use, I’ve been playing about with rsync and I have a backup.sh script I’ve been modifying. I made a bunch of changes, but made some basic mistakes. Rather than wade through it to fix it, I again threw it at Grok. It not only found my errors, but also provided me with a complete script “fixed” and ready to go.

Saved me a fair bit of time.

Every time my log file shows an error, I again ask Grok “what does this error mean?”. It comes back with an explanation and several ways of fixing it.

If I was doing a lot of coding (which I did years back but not so much today), I’d definitely leverage AI as I go along. Not just for debugging, but also as a learning tool. Finding some code that you’re unsure about and asking AI what it does is a lot quicker and easier than Googling it all.