They had nothing to sell since 2004.
http://web.archive.org/web/20040607060111/http://www.scopeware.com/
The year their Scopeware product was taken off the market. Seems to have failed. They couldn't sell their product and Mirror Worlds Technologies disbanded in 2003.
Do your research on the company. There's barely any word of them, especially since 2004.
Good for Apple. Pay out the patent trolls and continue actually making use of the tech.
The original owner of the tech couldn't do anything meaningful with it. Dollars-to-donuts he was sitting on it until he could milk someone for it. His *new* company, Mirror Worlds LLC, resurfaced later and was incorporated in . . . surprise, surprise . . . Tyler, Texas. He was just waiting for the opportunity to cash in.
So you in your view if you can not use a patent because you do not have the money to make good use out of then anyone should be able to use that idea for free.
Yes.
I can patent an idea and then sit on it till kingdom come. Then when someone finally makes use of it and cashes in I go ahead and call my lawyers.
I might even, with a fair bit of knowledge, test the waters with an idea, spend a few dollars to produce a few units, then withdraw it deliberately. By doing so I've essentially demo'd the idea and showed other, larger entities who DO have the resources to make something out of it.
I wait.
Years later Apple comes along. I call my lawyers. Profit.
The fact that he made an attempt in 2002 to produce something with it and failed is perhaps cause for sympathy, nothing more.
The good Professor and/or his affiliated company is enforcing their patent(s) without any manufacturing base.
And proof is in your post that you do not understand patents. They are also their to prevent big companies like Apple from abusing their market power by taking other people ideas and running with them. They can not compete with Apple due to Apple raw size and deep pockets.
Some people make a living on nothing more than coming up with ideas and selling them to 3rd parties.
Under US law, patent owners are not required to commercialize their "invention" in order to enforce their patents. Nor does the patent owner have to be the inventor. Patents can be bought, sold and licensed to anyone.
Under the law Apple must pay. I'm not disputing that under US law as it stands, Apple acted wrongfully.
However, I'm hardly shedding a tear that Gelernter and his little shell-company, who did absolutely nothing with the idea for at least seven years, have been hurt by Apple. In fact, just the opposite, they were waiting for payday in Texas.
But we're all copasetic in the end. Gelertner and co. got their payout, and we'll continue to enjoy CoverFlow and Time Machine.