Mods, please close this thread.
Are you a Consultant Mod or something?
I don't mind paying per se, but what I do mind is Apple not making this clear prior to the pre-order date. I think it would've been simply "the right thing to do" regardless of what the specific policy or pricing will be going forward.
I'm torn. As a consumer, I agree. But from a business standpoint - Apple doesn't owe you anything other that the latest OS available at the time of purchase. That's what you're buying.
And it seems like they are giving you that plus the next big upgrade (4.0).
Beyond that they MAY charge (it sounds like they aren't certain). But even if they do - a) what are the odds you'll still have the same iPad vs a new one - we could be talking 2 years from now. b) how is this any different than any other OS upgrade (snow leopard).
Remember - the iPad is NOT an iPhone or a big iPod Touch. So you can't really base the upgrade pattern on those devices. (said with tongue in cheek a bit). But sincerely - it's a new breed of device and new OS challenges. I don't behoove Apple for having to pass on some of the cost of overhauling their OS beyond one full version after I buy something
i think the main reason for the free iphone updates is that although they are giving away free os updates for it, they also use the updates to close security holes which may be detrimental to their business i.e. jail-breaking to allow unlocks etc..
my 2c
This was already addressed on the front page.
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/03/2...gm-ipad-sdk-firmware-and-licensing-agreement/
Free for 4.0, likely charged thereafter.
Mods, please close this thread.
I read this morning that Apple likely to charge for software updates like the ipod touch.
Cant remember the source but they were analyzing the small print from Apple
I read this morning that Apple likely to charge for software updates like the ipod touch.
Cant remember the source but they were analyzing the small print from Apple