The only problem with this is that a developer could release a new version that is the same just to clear their ratings, if they are bad.
I think the AppStore would catch on, and even if they did do that, people would still vote the same way if the app really is bad. Not only that, but people might vote down even further because they expected bug fixes and did not get it.
That's how it is in the Android Market, anyway. Developers do stuff just like that and it gets them nowhere.
No, that's not fair.
If version 1.0 of my app sucks, why should people think that version 1.1 is going to be any different? Sure, you fixed bugs. Great. But the next time you implement new features, as a user, you are probably going to break something again, since there is a process issue.
You're right. Mac OS X 10.0.0 sucked, so why would Leopard be any different?.
Photoshop 1.0 was pretty useless, so why would CS4 be any different?
If your next versions are great, the existing bad reviews will slowly become irrelevant as you improve your software.
Yeah, and since the ratings and reviews are irrelevant to what they apply to, why should they exist at all? You wouldn't go to a MacBook Pro Core Duo review to see if the new unibody MacBook Pro is worth buying, would you?
Or maybe you would - Why would it be any different? Right?
For those developers who released a buggy version 1.0 and got slammed - you deserved it. The solution is to not release bad software into the wild.
Oh, are you a troll? That's got to be what's going on here...
And for what it's worth, I do agree that a version number and date next to the review would be really helpful. I just don't think they should go away. As a customer, I want to know if the developer is prone to releasing buggy software.
Perhaps ratings and reviews should be kept, but on a per-version basis. The ratings and reviews you see in the AppStore on your iPhone could be the ones for the current version, and if you want to see the version history with reviews for each version, go to the AppStore on iTunes and check it out.
But a review for Google Mobile App that is 1 starred and saying "this is useless, they should add speech to text searching" is pretty pointless and confusing to potential downloaders. The description says it has speech to text, but the reviewer gave it one star and said it needs it!
All good points mentioned here. But I have another question: Why is it that when you sort apps by "top paid" or "top free", for instance, number 10 will have only 700 reviews and 3 stars? How is that a "top" app? All "top" apps should be 5 stars, no?
No, the topness is based on purchases, not rating. They are the top purchased apps.