Hey photog gang, 'hope you are all doing well.
I had the privilege of seeing "an" Apple tablet prototype - I don't know if it is "the" tablet, as according to its owner, there have been many prototypes over the past few years. It was slick and sleek, but didn't have any fantastic crazy features - just a version of OS X that I didn't recognize (definitely not the iPhone OS).
Also according to its owner, it hasn't been released because Apple has had trouble finding the right audience. It has always had niche groups like doctors, teachers, etc. - but there was no compelling mass-audience functionality that would drive people to buy it over a small laptop. Without apps and developers, it has been designed toward driving "new" print media -- my guess is the partnership that TIME magazine is developing now with magazines like National Geographic and other content-rich providers. That part is pure speculation on my part, and I am getting off my own topic!
Anyway, to my point - it did have integrated iTunes/iPhoto and it seemed geared toward multimedia display and storage. Think Surface, but obviously much smaller. The photo manipulation and display was absolutely stunning (eye candy to say the least!)
Would you consider something like this for storing photographs at a shoot, or for bringing along family photos when traveling? WiFi was inside, so my guess is that with a wireless adapter for a camera or with one of the EyeFi SD cards, a photog could stream the photos right onto the tablet.
I might be more inclined to drink the Kool-aid than most, so maybe I am biased in saying that I think it would be "fun" (but not necessary) to have such a device with me on a shoot. An extra backup for memory cards, plus an instant way to show/display photos does have its appeal.
Would a device like this impact your photography work, and would you be inclined to buy it? (I have no idea on pricing but I would guess sub-$1000.)
I had the privilege of seeing "an" Apple tablet prototype - I don't know if it is "the" tablet, as according to its owner, there have been many prototypes over the past few years. It was slick and sleek, but didn't have any fantastic crazy features - just a version of OS X that I didn't recognize (definitely not the iPhone OS).
Also according to its owner, it hasn't been released because Apple has had trouble finding the right audience. It has always had niche groups like doctors, teachers, etc. - but there was no compelling mass-audience functionality that would drive people to buy it over a small laptop. Without apps and developers, it has been designed toward driving "new" print media -- my guess is the partnership that TIME magazine is developing now with magazines like National Geographic and other content-rich providers. That part is pure speculation on my part, and I am getting off my own topic!
Anyway, to my point - it did have integrated iTunes/iPhoto and it seemed geared toward multimedia display and storage. Think Surface, but obviously much smaller. The photo manipulation and display was absolutely stunning (eye candy to say the least!)
Would you consider something like this for storing photographs at a shoot, or for bringing along family photos when traveling? WiFi was inside, so my guess is that with a wireless adapter for a camera or with one of the EyeFi SD cards, a photog could stream the photos right onto the tablet.
I might be more inclined to drink the Kool-aid than most, so maybe I am biased in saying that I think it would be "fun" (but not necessary) to have such a device with me on a shoot. An extra backup for memory cards, plus an instant way to show/display photos does have its appeal.
Would a device like this impact your photography work, and would you be inclined to buy it? (I have no idea on pricing but I would guess sub-$1000.)