Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

BoulderBum

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 3, 2008
513
0
Note: I'm including a whole quote, but since quantity is covered elsewhere, I figured this thread could explore Jobs' statement about quality.

http://www.appleinsider.com/article...obs_over_successor_games_future_products.html

When asked about video rental media availability in iTunes in terms of both quality and quantity, Jobs admitted that the studios have fallen behind in delivering content, mirroring the same kinds of issues labels had in setting up music within the first year of the iTunes Store. Jobs said the goal of 1000 rental titles was still short at around 600, and that quality varied from "spectacular to than less that what we'd like to see," but noted that the studios are working on difficult issues with gaining clearance for content created before anyone had contemplated Internet distribution. Existing films need to have rights lined up from talent and copyright owners who had never outlined their rights and royalties in terms of downloads, and work in those areas is accelerating.

I am a person who bought the Apple TV the day I heard about rentals and bought an HDTV to go with it! Something I noticed is that the "HD" movie rentals don't look all that HD compared to some of the live HD shows I see on cable.

I wonder if the quality will improve as downloaded rentals become more popular.
 
A lot of the live HD shows you see on cable are being broadcast in 1080i.
1080i's resolution (IIRC) is 1920 × 1080.

AppleTV HD shows are 720p.
720p's resolution (IIRC) is 1280 x 720.

Both are HD, but there's going to be a difference in how a show encoded in 1920x1080 looks as compared to show encoded in 1280x720.

What was nice last night was to be able to switch over to my AppleTV when all of my local broadcast stations were running 'severe weather watch' info at the bottom of the HD shows, down-converting the shows from 1080i to something that looked like 1980s VHS quality. ack! AppleTV HD rentals never looked better! :D
 
Hey, don't get me wrong, I love Apple TV, I bought a unit from Apple and an HDTV to go with it the day I heard Apple was getting rentals from all the studios, it's just that the last two threads I started are the recent headlines that were of any interest. Downloadable movies are the future and I think Apple is now the closest to getting the process right!

That said, while Apple TV got me into video Podcasts, Flickr screensavers and YouTube on my TV (which is cooler than I thought it would be), I can't help but think the rental stuff has room to grow.

The selection stuff I ranted about elsewhere, but in regards to quality, while I think 720p is perfectly acceptable, it almost looks as if, even though you technically have 720p resolution, some quality is lost in the compression.

To be fair, I notice that on-demand "HD" from Comcast is even worse, but when I see Conan O'Brian in HD or watch MHD (MTV HD) live, the picture is just so much crisper!
 
Hey, don't get me wrong, I love Apple TV, I bought a unit from Apple and an HDTV to go with it the day I heard Apple was getting rentals from all the studios, it's just that the last two threads I started are the recent headlines that were of any interest. Downloadable movies are the future and I think Apple is now the closest to getting the process right!

That said, while Apple TV got me into video Podcasts, Flickr screensavers and YouTube on my TV (which is cooler than I thought it would be), I can't help but think the rental stuff has room to grow.

The selection stuff I ranted about elsewhere, but in regards to quality, while I think 720p is perfectly acceptable, it almost looks as if, even though you technically have 720p resolution, some quality is lost in the compression.

To be fair, I notice that on-demand "HD" from Comcast is even worse, but when I see Conan O'Brian in HD or watch MHD (MTV HD) live, the picture is just so much crisper!

Downloadable movies may be the future, but not the present. Notice how Apple is only renting HD movies right now. Start doing any serious buying and you might as well buy hard drives wholesale. These HD rentals also are at 720p as you mentioned, which is patooey when you have a Blu-ray player putting out 1080p. I have a 720p and 1080p television, and the difference is easily seen.

I think what Apple TV will do is keep you from having to dig out DVDs and BDs every time you want to watch something. If the stupid entertainment industry would give up trying to control DVD ripping, it sure would make this easier. I've got the hang of HandBrake, but this digital video stuff would work so much better if it didn't take an open-source application to do it.

As far as quality, everything looks good to me. The HD trailers I watched didn't look totally HD, but they were the clearest thing I have seen from a digital video file.
 
I'm with you on the DVD ripping stuff. I can understand not wanting movies streamed around on BitTorrent, but the hassles and restrictions the movie industry places on legal digital media are one of the reasons people use BitTorrent!

I know I've been tempted to use it, since the movie industry doesn't give me what I want.

Anyway, I consider Apple TV rentals part of the "downloadable movie" category, even if you don't store them permanently.

That said, I suspect home NAS devices will become more popular as movie downloads become more popular. I myself have an HP MediaSmart Server which serves as the source of all my iTunes content.

Right now, it has a TB of storage, and the beauty of the device is that it can scale up to four internal disks and several external, so I could scale up to about 15 TB given today's disk technology, all while maintaining the same logical drive letter for the various physical drives.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.