WP7 has been out for a year now and we know the result...
I don't think Windows 8 will be a game-changer either. It's too little, too late for Microsoft to disrupt iOS momentum. To beat Apple at the new game they need to come up with a device twice as awesome as iPad and I don't see that happening with their OS-licensing business model (not even mentioning how far behind MSFT is lagging in terms of ecosystem).
I don't agree with that last part I underlined. Apple needs not to shift paradigms. What's actually happening is that business-computing paradigms are shifting slowly, but enough to allow Apple to make some inroads mostly with iPhone and iPad, but even with the Mac. It's the "
Consumerization of IT"
The interesting part of the article is also that IT servicing people try to keep Macs out as they demand less servicing.
It also looks that it is now much more possible to indulge to preferences of office employees - and often theirs are on a Mac.
The article, of course, only hints on change, but, as you noted, Windows 7 wasn't that big game changer, and PCs are still much too service intensive.
Whenever you come in contact with people who work on computers professionally, they have a lot of respect for OS X.
Who knows what Tim Cook is going to do? Updating the professional line would be one possibility. I could even imagine a resurgence of a dedicated Server that fits in tight rack space.
Apple has the money and resources to do almost anything they want in their business field.
In turn, it sounds like you're not in corporate IT management, and are just repeating something you read on the NYT website that happens to fit with your skewed perception of reality.
This is a thread about a New York article, and I'm linking to it, and paraphrasing it (even if you like to call it "repeating". Well, you may be in corporate IT management, but this doesn't make "repeating", "paraphrasing", and "quoting" mean the same.
You think the New York Times' reporting is "skewed"? And this without a single argument? That's cute.