Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jst1nt

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 16, 2014
117
28
Albany, NY
I thought this was interesting....

"Apple Watch

Double-click to pay and go. You can pay with Apple Watch — just double‑click the button next to the Digital Crown and hold the face of your Apple Watch near the contactless reader. A gentle pulse and beep confirm that your payment information was sent."
https://www.apple.com/apple-pay/

I assume this is to save on battery life (considering Apple is already struggling for battery life) so that the watch isn't constantly searching for NFC reader.....
 

The Doctor11

macrumors 603
Dec 15, 2013
6,030
1,519
New York
I think this is just so you don't pay accidentally. Pretty hard to hold your phone to a NFC reader on accident, but pretty easy to do with a watch.
 

Julien

macrumors G4
Jun 30, 2007
11,847
5,441
Atlanta
Also it is probably more to do with security. If a NFC comes in contact with your iPhone you must use your Finger Print ID to authorize the transaction. The :apple:Watch doesn't have this. So someone could hold a NFC 'spoofer' next to your :apple:Watch and make an unauthorized transaction. So using the Crown for the authorization prevents this.
 

jamesjingyi

macrumors 6502a
Dec 20, 2011
850
156
UK
Watch sounds cool in this sense but they would have to build in some way of cutting it off if someone stole it. I mean it would be devastating if someone got your watch and paid for **** tons of stuff with it before you could stop them..
 

jst1nt

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 16, 2014
117
28
Albany, NY
Watch sounds cool in this sense but they would have to build in some way of cutting it off if someone stole it. I mean it would be devastating if someone got your watch and paid for **** tons of stuff with it before you could stop them..

I believe that when it looses contact with the skin you have to reenter the passcode to unlock the apple watch.
 

Piggie

macrumors G3
Feb 23, 2010
9,182
4,112
I believe that when it looses contact with the skin you have to reenter the passcode to unlock the apple watch.

I'm guessing there must be a delay, what 30 seconds or a minute?

What do you think?
 

Piggie

macrumors G3
Feb 23, 2010
9,182
4,112
I'm thinking no delay.

The reason I think there must be a delay is for the time you adjust the watch on your wrist, or due to strap tightness it slips on your wrist.

If the watch moves against your skin, it would I'm sure mess it's monitoring signals up for a few moments, hence me thinking there must be some small delay before it's sure it's signal loss is that you've taken it off as opposed to you have just readjusted it's position.
 

BvizioN

macrumors 603
Mar 16, 2012
5,704
4,825
Manchester, UK
The reason I think there must be a delay is for the time you adjust the watch on your wrist, or due to strap tightness it slips on your wrist.

If the watch moves against your skin, it would I'm sure mess it's monitoring signals up for a few moments, hence me thinking there must be some small delay before it's sure it's signal loss is that you've taken it off as opposed to you have just readjusted it's position.

My guess it there could be a smart way to differentiate movements around your wrist from completely being removed from your wrist.
 

Runt888

macrumors 6502a
Nov 17, 2008
841
32
The reason I think there must be a delay is for the time you adjust the watch on your wrist, or due to strap tightness it slips on your wrist.

If the watch moves against your skin, it would I'm sure mess it's monitoring signals up for a few moments, hence me thinking there must be some small delay before it's sure it's signal loss is that you've taken it off as opposed to you have just readjusted it's position.

My guess it there could be a smart way to differentiate movements around your wrist from completely being removed from your wrist.

I'm willing to bet that it can tell roughly how far it is from your skin (it has multiple photosensors in slightly different locations so calculating a distance shouldn't be difficult). That being the case, it should be able to tell the difference between adjusting/moving on your wrist and being taken off completely.
 

kdarling

macrumors P6
The question that's been brought up before is:

Is it using just proximity, or something more sophisticated?

If just proximity, then sliding something under it would fool the sensors, while you remove the watch.

If it looks for a pulse once in a while, then the question is what is the delay, and can something with a pattern on it be used to slide back and forth and fool the sensors until it's on a new wrist.

Of course, if it also checks for Bluetooth connection to the owner's phone, that helps a lot. A thief walking away with the watch, would soon find it locked.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.