As this is my first time opening a new thread of discussions on the forum, I come to you with a question that hunts me for some time now.
Why does Apple makes an exception for their apps when it comes down to requesting acccess for resources?
Case in point: Calendar, Notes, Reminders, Phone, Messages, Mail, Fitness, Health and I'm sure, a couple of others that I won't enumareate here, all of them, request on a daily basis, access to Contacts.
If I go to Privacy > Contacts, I only see 3rd party apps there. Nothing from Apple's own software. Same for the Camera app, it requested access to use the Microphone (even if I only took photos, not Live ones). If I go to Privacy > Microphone, only 3rd party, no Apple apps.
I do understand that apps need to share resources between them in order for this ecosystem to work properly, but I cannot stop noticing this conflict of interests here, small hypocrisy if I may call it that way. Why not include your own apps as part of the same privacy system, and only include others? Especially if you brag about privacy each time you get on stage.
My hypotesis is that Apple is afraid that the perception about them (regarding privacy) will change for the worst if people will start seeing popups with "Fitness needs access to your Contacts" or "Safari needs access to your Contacts". I also wonder if those apps will still function with basic functionality. For example, I don't need Microphone access to take a simple photo - not a Live one). I don't need to grant Safari access to my Contacts if I don't use some sharing feature, and only browsing the web by myself.
What do you think? I guess I can include here access to control some other resources, like the gyroscope. But that could be another discussion entirely.
Why does Apple makes an exception for their apps when it comes down to requesting acccess for resources?
Case in point: Calendar, Notes, Reminders, Phone, Messages, Mail, Fitness, Health and I'm sure, a couple of others that I won't enumareate here, all of them, request on a daily basis, access to Contacts.
If I go to Privacy > Contacts, I only see 3rd party apps there. Nothing from Apple's own software. Same for the Camera app, it requested access to use the Microphone (even if I only took photos, not Live ones). If I go to Privacy > Microphone, only 3rd party, no Apple apps.
I do understand that apps need to share resources between them in order for this ecosystem to work properly, but I cannot stop noticing this conflict of interests here, small hypocrisy if I may call it that way. Why not include your own apps as part of the same privacy system, and only include others? Especially if you brag about privacy each time you get on stage.
My hypotesis is that Apple is afraid that the perception about them (regarding privacy) will change for the worst if people will start seeing popups with "Fitness needs access to your Contacts" or "Safari needs access to your Contacts". I also wonder if those apps will still function with basic functionality. For example, I don't need Microphone access to take a simple photo - not a Live one). I don't need to grant Safari access to my Contacts if I don't use some sharing feature, and only browsing the web by myself.
What do you think? I guess I can include here access to control some other resources, like the gyroscope. But that could be another discussion entirely.
Last edited: