I saw this posted online.
Thoughts?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...152d4e4b014e7c72edd8b?timestamp=1482774805493
Thoughts?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...152d4e4b014e7c72edd8b?timestamp=1482774805493
First of all, share us your thought on this.I saw this posted online.
Thoughts?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...152d4e4b014e7c72edd8b?timestamp=1482774805493
I saw this posted online.
Thoughts?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...152d4e4b014e7c72edd8b?timestamp=1482774805493
Let me introduce myself. I have been a Mac user (perhaps better described as “addict”) since 1985.
Originally, I owned an Apple II. When the basic Macintosh came out (you remember, the gray box with a screen in it?) I bought it. It was my primary business expenditure for the year back then. I bought the Mac plus, the SE, and then kept upgrading.
It was not a bad post, but two things got to me:I found the article to resonate with me.
I think his "credentials" as a mac fan, are clear, given what he wrote
Yet, his complaints that the company has focused too much on thinness at the expensive other attributes do make sense. I'm not here bashing apple, but rather pointing out that we have a person who eloquently posted how the changes apple has been focusing on left him behind.
I will say that this seems to be a trend, i.e., people saying similar things here at Macrumors, or blogs and now at major sites like the huffingtonpost.
Agreed, not only is the term over used, its done so myopically. I think its safe to use that many people use a laptop for specific needs and it doesn't have to be qualified.believes that they are the only type of "Pro".